Aubrey (3508) - Bellingham, Washington, USA - NOV 15, 2005
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
UPDATED: APR 15, 2006 Medium amber-orange. Fruity-hoppy nose. Very smooth and weighty texture with a creamy carbonation; kind of chewy. Wholesome malts had an organic quality; wheat germ and crackers. Noticeable alcohol -- fruity and vodka-like; warming. Healthy bitterness; sharp, grassy hops. Overall, decent flavors; aromas seemed a bit restrained. Sweetness was mild, but the beer seemed to be balanced.
Ernest (7031) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - NOV 13, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Head is initially small, fizzy, off-white, mostly diminishing. Body is medium amber. Aroma is lightly malty (caramel), lightly hoppy (flowers, apricot), with a note of alcohol. Flavor is moderately sweet, lightly acidic. Finish is lightly sweet, lightly acidic, lightly bitter. Medium body, watery texture, lively carbonation, moderately alcoholic. Almost zero aroma, big disappointment there. Flavor is ok but pretty uninteresting. Big yawner.
Crosling (1864) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - NOV 13, 2005
3.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Bright crimson hued. It is lacking aroma, unfortunately and I wonder why. Light hints of fruit and coconut, but itís very subtle overall. Flavor is very rich and enjoyable, with coconut flavors so authentic, it makes you think it was aged in some barrel. White pepper, butter toffee and cream flavor, with a soft, succulent smooth texture. Wish the aroma was better, but this is still a very nice, enjoyable beer.
Murphy (1759) - Fort Collins, Colorado, USA - NOV 13, 2005
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Tiny head, light copper color. Candied aroma. Taste is pretty sweet, highlighted by more candi sweetness. Medium alcohol burn. Nice mild malty sweetness. Finish is clean. Very barleywine like, with little wheat beer characteristics, still good.
bigrond (1499) - factoryville, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 13, 2005
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
I love the big beers and this was big. Nice even flavor and good striong finish .
maniac (3800) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - NOV 11, 2005
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
brown in color, no head at all. has a light hoppy aroma. Starts off decent, but over time the taste will start wearing on you.
ClarkVV (4841) - Allston, Massachusetts, USA - NOV 10, 2005
3.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: FEB 26, 2007 Really need to rate this one, as Iíve now had it about six or seven times from the bottle. Wish you could give points based on the label, as this one has an outstanding Romantic depiction of a Ceres/Demeter-like figure. Very unique label. Iíll probably hold on to a couple bottles just for the label. Ok letís see what else I can say thatís not about the beer itself. . .nope, thatís about it.
Batch 1 2005 bomber
Pours a copper-goldenrod, nice and dark, with only a chill haze. Little to no sediment on the bottom, though it is bottle conditioned. Head is very large, but recedes quickly to a cover, with light lacing left behind. Head is off-white colored. Aroma of sharp, dry wheat, lots of fruitiness (apples, pears, oranges, unripened peaches), with soft, sweaty, only lightly bitter hops. A touch of dry caramel and toasted grains lingers in the background, while you can definitely sense a bit of strong, perfumey alcohol esters. Flavor is very bold immediately, with a sharp, acidic wheat twang and alcohol heat. Moderately sweet caramel comes in to the mix, with ripe red berries and more drying yellow fruits on the end. Alcohol is definitely present, but not in an obnoxious way, just rather warming. Expansive mouthfeel with a lightly creamy texture at times. Wheat wines are just too acidic/sharp for my tastes. Wheat already adds enough dryness without having to then up the alcohol. I think thatís why I enjoyed triticus so much more, the dark malts really helped balance the wheat and alcohol. A well-made beer for what itís trying to do, just not my cup of tea. Sticky caramel, lightly bitter, leafy hops and a bit of raisins and candied oranges linger on.
5000 (6599) - Hardened Liver, Washington, USA - NOV 9, 2005
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Bottle: Pale caramel color, orangish hued, fairly viscous pour, thin white head, spotty lacing, moderate carbonation. † Sweet hop nose, caramel, touch of alcohol. † Smells fairly tasty. † Sweet citrusy zing, loads of caramel, subtle hop presense. † Not terribly big, but fairly smooth and tasty. † Not as big or full in the mouthfeel as suggested by the pour. † Lingering candied citrus peel and caramel on the exit. † Lighter than expected, but still sweet and malty enough to make me happy. † More like a Barley Wine light. † Thanks Jeff!
jasonp (1564) - Ashburn, Virginia, USA - NOV 6, 2005
3.8 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pours a fiery clear dark amber with a quickly fading white head. Aroma of honey, white wine, floral hops and a bouquet of flowers. Flavor has notes of wheat, caramel, zesty floral grapefruity-hops, pine, toasted malt, cherry, wood, white grapes and a touch of bath soap (but not in a bad way). Pleasantly sweet with ample, yet smooth hop bitterness. Medium bodied, smooth texture and moderate carbonation - it could have been a little more thick and lush. Overall a very good beer, pretty original IMO.
mephisto (1284) - TAIWAN - NOV 4, 2005
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
another hoppy big wheat beer after stoneís 9th anniversary. a new trend? not much wheat flavor, dominated by hops. grapefruit aroma, bitter.