JohnC (3000) - Mission Viejo, California, USA - MAR 28, 2008
3.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
On draft at Bardenay in Eagle. Clear reddish amber pour with a one finger white head. Itís an easy drinking malty amber ale. I liked it.
Bradrcr (808) - Renton, Washington, USA - MAR 15, 2008
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
3/7/08 on draught at the brewpub. Aroma is highly malt dominant, with a strong roast, almost Munich character. Hops are nearly nonexistant. Appearance is clear reddish gold with a medium maintained off white head. Flavor is still malt dominant, but the roast is not as strong and gives more of a sweet/sour presentation accomapanied by low earthy bittering. Mouthfeel is medium/low bodied with a medium carb feel and tangy finish. Overall, this isnít to style but thereís just not much to complain about; good and easy drinking.
BuckeyeBoy (2189) - Boise, Idaho, USA - AUG 11, 2007
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
On tap at brewpub pours out a hazy amber topped with a light tan head. Pretty cool hop/malt mix. A good tasting amber.
jake65 (2334) - Williston, North Dakota, USA - MAR 21, 2007
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Draft: Pours a very dark amber with reddish tones, large white head, and thick lacing. Nose is faint malt, earthiness, and floral hops. The taste is more of hops than of malt; a little earthiness and some florals. Lingering finish of light bitters. Different from the mainstream ambers Iíve tried recently - in a good way.
pinkzambia (1301) - Boise, Idaho, USA - DEC 22, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
On Tap at brewpub: I was disappointed with this ale. It is Amberís like this one that makes me want to switch my favorite style from an amber to something else. It had sweet, malty aromas and tastes which I can deal with, even though I prefer a more bitter aftertaste. But the combination of too much carbonation and a watery feel made me think it was lacking something. Since I am not a brew master, I donít know what it was -- hops maybe? Anyway, I am going to have to say "nothing great - go back to the drawing board. Get Mack & Jackís recipe!"
IndianaRed (1799) - Boise, Idaho, USA - AUG 31, 2005
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
On Tap at the brewpub
Deep redish amber witha small off-white head and nice lacing. Very light, woody malt flavor and I couldnít detect hardly any hoppiness. A littel bitternes at the end and drinkable I suppose.
ontario102 (794) - Boise, Idaho, USA - MAR 12, 2005
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Not a bad amber; nutty and biscuitey flavor; moderatly light body; flavorful yet only slightly hoppy, chocolate notes; fairly complex and full of charactor for an amber; nice!
DomiNate (123) - Boise, Idaho, USA - JUN 2, 2004
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Dark hazy brown pour. With a little mahogany highlights. Smell of honey and chocolate overtones. Nice roast finish.
Sham (1845) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 7, 2004
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Cloudy brownish orange pour with a thick, foamy head. Nice lace on this one. Nice aroma of base malts and earthy hops. Flavors are a very good blend of malt and hops. Very smooth.. The beer looks good, it goes down smooth, but it's not terribly complex.
harlequinn (2744) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - AUG 3, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I liked this one, but it had an aftertaste that kind of disapointed me. Slightly piney, but extremely balanced, with a nice mixture of hops and malt, a hoppy bite in the aftertaste, with the malt shining through immediately afterwards. Truly not bad.