JuStuka (201) - Edo De Mex, MEXICO - SEP 1, 2008
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
UPDATED: FEB 25, 2011 Horrible!!!!!!! not so bad as the other sol beers, but this has nothing special.
presario (4428) - Stampede City, Alberta, CANADA - JUL 20, 2008
1.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
HORRID! Not the usual tasteless metallic NA but a mix of vegetable and skunk.
Grovlam (4150) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - MAR 8, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bottle. Very small fizzy white head that mostly diminished. Spare lacework. Clear sparkling body with a pale yellow color. Aroma was very malty and grainy like. Over the palate came again malt, hay and brew mash like notes. Light bodied with an average carbonation and thin texture. Light sweet flavor. Light sweet malty finish.
184601 (206) - Mexicali, MEXICO - MAR 1, 2008
2.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 7/20
My rating its based on the fact that its a low.Alcohol.Good aroma a bit metallic,the appearance its gold yellow body, with very little white big-bubble head, that fades to nothing in two minutes, the flavour its a little metallic, no hops whatsoever present, sourer than standard Sol. Overall good if you are driving that night, tought, not better than O’douls Amber, its still better than a lot Light beers out there.
Nekronos (3359) - Xalapa, MEXICO - MAY 7, 2007
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
The new member of the Sol family, it is not at least as awfula s most non alcohol beers. It was refreshing because of the heat.