pianotu (65) - USA - MAY 27, 2013
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Quite flavorful for a light beer--very refreshing and drinkable, but definitely not watery and bland.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
kryon (1011) - SWEDEN - MAY 20, 2012
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
On sample at Southampton publick house.
It is a typical pale lager which means watery, sloppy and quite boring. This one however has a bit of taste and is fresh and cool quite enjoyable
dnstone (2045) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - MAR 26, 2012
1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Light toasted malt. Clean-clear golden in color. Refreshing but super light and still a lager, though one of the better ones Ive had for the style.
mcmisko (348) - New York, USA - JAN 23, 2012
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I don’t like this style of beer at all. But is was offered as part of a sampler beer platter at Southampton PH. Aroma: Malts. Appearance: golden light honey. Taste: malts and simple hops, nicely carbonated. Palate: light, like water. I would drink this over all the other light beers out there, although I am not sure I can tell to much of a difference since I usually stay away from light beers.
puzzl (3216) - New York, New York, USA - MAR 7, 2010
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Tap. Garlic, celery, corn aroma, bright and spritzy and very vegetal. Slightly muddy, flavor has notes of celery. Bleh.
PilsnerPeter (3028) - Flushing, New York, USA - JUL 14, 2009
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Tap at the brewpub: Headless very pale golden color. Adjuncty aroma- ricey with some chicken feed and brewing cereal. Fizzy and vacant feel. Papery flavor with mild corn and sulfuric notes. Hardly hopped at all. Quite macro feeling. Why does a quality brewhouse even bother with something like this? If they’re looking to cater to the masses their Golden Lager does just that, and that one is a decent offering.
Rciesla (5499) - Exit 15W, New Jersey, USA - DEC 8, 2008
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Draft. A simple pale lager light malt with a simple hop bitterness with accents of grass and citrus. Simple and plain.
DSG (4677) - Tel Aviv, ISRAEL - NOV 30, 2008
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
(10/25/08) Draught sample at the brewpub in Southampton. Clear pale golden color. Aroma of pale malt, a bit of fresh hops with light grassy and citrus notes. Sweetish malty flavor with some graininess a slightly drier finish. Light to medium-bodied. A decent light beer.
islay (771) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - AUG 1, 2008
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
4 oz. sample, on tap at the brewpub. Consumed on 7-31-08. "Beery," metallic aroma features light citrus (mainly lemon). Pours a clear, effervescent pale gold with near-white head. Looks pretty cool for what it is. The taste is that of an above average pale lager. There’s not much to it, but it’s not offensive. Fizzy, crisp, and lively on the palate. Light body, but not as light as I expected.
Chapel (468) - Levittown, New York, USA - FEB 18, 2008
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 7/20
The one thing I have to give this credit for is that it was extremely smooth. Other than that this is an extremely poor beer. Pours like urine. Smells like water. Tastes like grass. I am embarrassed to say that I got this for the rating from the otherwise excellent brew pub known as the South Hampton Publick House.