RateBeer
Score
1990
OVERALLStyle
Brewed by South Australia Brewing (Lion Nathan Co.)
Style: Pale Lager
Thebarton, Australia

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag | edit barcodes |
RATINGS: 27   MEAN: 2.53/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.55   EST. CALORIES: 150   ABV: 5%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This multi-award winning golden lager is a flavourful accompaniment to a wide range of foods. Our premium is brewed with the finest local barley malt and with a blend of premium imported aroma and Tasmanian bitter hops. Winning the Champion Australasian Beer trophy at the 2001 Australian International Beer awards, further confirms its reputation as South Australia's finest premium lager.


2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Dredd (562) - Bentleigh, AUSTRALIA - AUG 30, 2003
not a bad little beer. Good head, aroma, taste & mouthfeel. However, it lacks any real character to make it stand out. Would drink it again, but wouldn't go out of my way to buy a case either.

1.4
   AROMA 1/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 1/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 10/20
farmboy (218) - Barwon Heads, AUSTRALIA - AUG 26, 2003
Gets a pass mark for being quite drinkable but nothing to write home to Mummy about.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 8/20
Sully (1378) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - JUN 4, 2003
An interesting comparison with Steinlager. Very similar but for the use of Pride of Ringwood hops and therefore a lack of aroma. Body is good, head clean and malt presence not bad. Yet, it still lacks character.

3.4
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
dubs (117) - St Peters, NSW, AUSTRALIA - DEC 11, 2002
Cool. Nice beer I reckon. Hit the proverbial spot on a hot day last week... I reckon this is what a pilsener Urquell mixed with a XXXX would taste like. Cool. Is that Saaz hops in there?

2.2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - MAY 18, 2002
Loved their stout so I had this. Dry cider aroma & standard aussie appearance. Flavour is just not right, not much of it, only slightly bitter & wierd aftertaste.

1.6
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 1/20
inhut99 (1) - Brisbane, AUSTRALIA - MAR 7, 2002 does not count
I have to agrre with the baron. After finally getting a carton of this up to Brisbane (I,m from Adelaide) for my birthday, I couldn’t bring myself to tell my wife it’s not as good as it was.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 9/20
Caton (160) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAR 3, 2002
One of the better premium aussie styles, Great balance and a beer that you can keep drinking all night. Light on the fizz for easy consumption.

1.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 7/20
duff (5483) - St, Margarets, Greater London, ENGLAND - JAN 26, 2002
Re-rate: Smells like any other Aussie lager, but perhaps less chemically and a bit more hoppy, tastes OK, nice blend of bubbliness and creaminess on the palate, nice first up maltiness and good hoppiness, but then (as motelpogo said), ends up having that preservative taste that Aussie lagers seem to have.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



View Page
1 2 3


Tick this beer
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5



Rating Notecard:
Beer: Southwark Premium Rating Avg: 2.55 No. of Ratings: 27
Copyright © 2000-2012,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Feedback?
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50