Malty_MacHops (640) - Eastanollee, Georgia, USA - JUN 16, 2013
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Not the worst I’ve experienced, though certainly not the best either. Grassy and grainy aromas. Pale golden with a fizzy foamy head. Lightly bitter. Light bodied with a dry finish.
spatenfan (54) - Wisconsin, USA - JUN 12, 2015
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Faint grain and malt aroma. Light golden in color with a two finger, fast fading white head. Great warm weather, refreshing beer.
foyle (322) - Wyoming, USA - MAY 25, 2015
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured from 12 oz bottle into pilsner glass
Appearance: pours a 1+" frothy head that drops slowly. Color is clear pale straw with mild streaming carbonation.
Aroma: initially a bit of skunk (green bottle) once that subsided, some mild sweet malt and grassiness.
Mouthfeel: light and watery with a somewhat dry finish.
Flavor: sweet yeast rolls with a mild hop bite that lingers in the finish.
Overall: nothing offensive (other than the initial skunk), but not near the best in this style.
purpledotdays (2) - Arizona, USA - MAY 23, 2015 does not count
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Funny to read repeated "corn" comments. Sure, it is an InBev product, but it does not contain corn, so you have to discount those reviews. Lower alcohol content can be a plus when you have chores. Taste is acceptable and German enough. Not my favorite beer, but readily available and modestly priced.
aumentm (449) - North Carolina, USA - MAY 7, 2015
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Classic german beer. A staple that is light with a light taste and distinct german aroma.
Jabah (211) - Winter Park, Florida, USA - APR 15, 2015
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is the typical yellow skunky beer...but not quite like bud, etc. Smoother since it’s a "pilsner". Besides that, the taste isn’t all that bad. I’d say that it’s drinkable, but barely. Don’t know why anyone would buy this though, with so many alternatives out there for the same price.
mstrcrwly (667) - New York, USA - APR 8, 2015
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
another of the special beers from my youth..now..it’s malty water with fizz..utterly undrinkable.
Jow (2708) - New York, USA - APR 5, 2015
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle at Easter. Gold pour that flattens out. Cardboard and grainy nose. Tastes of corn grains cardboard. Lemon. Sour in bad way.
tnkw01 (1336) - Knoxville, Tennessee, USA - MAR 9, 2015
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 1/20
Bottle. Clear, gold color with a medium head. Smells like skunk and tastes like skunk.
Augdraught1981 (201) - Harlem, Georgia, USA - FEB 27, 2015
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Clear gold pour with a healthy one finger head. Slightly skunked aroma with a silky smooth body & German malt flavor that’s more velvety smooth than crisp. Finishes watery but that’s ok, its a pale lager and a step above others I can think of. I could really get into drinking this on a regular basis as a lawnmower beer.
Chad9976 (1421) - Albany, New York, USA - FEB 15, 2015
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I’ve only reviewed a few beers from Brauerei Beck & Co., but they’ve all been pretty bad and leads me to believe this might be the worst brewery in the world (it is part of the InBev conglomerate after all). This is another generic pale lager that is supposedly all-malt, but is completely lacking in flavor or distinctiveness. I don’t think brown bottles or cans would make much of a difference – it’s just plain bad.
I poured a 12oz bottle into a lager glass. It had a best before date of 9/2015 and cost $1.85 ($0.15 per ounce).
Appearance: Pale amber hue, crystal clear with slow steady carbonation. Pours to a small, white, soapy head which fizzles away and leaves no lacing.
Smell: Strong skunk odor due to the green bottle. Eventually fades. Little genuine beer aroma.
Taste: I think I have a pretty high tolerance for bad macro beers. I can recall drinking other brews much worse than this, but I’m still scoring St. Pauli Girl Lager low because it’s a lousy beer overall. The palette is pretty bland and boring; no malt or hop characteristics whatsoever. Initially, there’s a tang or spoiled flavor from the light strike, but I seem to build a tolerance to that quickly. Other beers of the general style tend to have a modicum of sweetness, but there’s none to be found here. Kind of ironic considering how it touts its ingredients. There are much better examples of mediocre pale lagers and they’re as readily available and cheaper than this. Avoid.
Drinkability: At only 5% ABV, it’s clear that St. Pauli Girl Lager isn’t intended to be fussed over. The mouthfeel is thin and crisp with a watery texture. It doesn’t finish completely clean as the skunky character actually does linger on the tongue for a bit. Though light in body I would not consider this a refreshing beer.