bob32256 (171) - Jacksonville, Florida, USA - FEB 23, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
light amber color with a thin white head; fairly typical "green bottle" aroma; the taste is mostly of hops with a medium bitter finish
mkobes (2140) - paramus, New Jersey, USA - FEB 1, 2004
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
Clear in color. Slightly hoppy with little hop flavor. Clean and crisp in flavor. Pretty good. I like it. Good beer for a day of football.
MaiBockAddict (1497) - Good Beer Bar Deprived, New Jersey, USA - FEB 1, 2004
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours clear with little head. Slight hop aroma, but not much more. Clean crisp pils flavor with a little hops and bitterness. Just not enough hops for my liking.
SpringsLicker (3120) - Tennessee, USA - FEB 1, 2004
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
This one wasn't skunked (tried this on several occasions) so I'll have to assume that it was representative of the beer other than some possible freshness loss. Good golden color and a head that lacked a bit of retention. Good maltiness with the proper balaance of bitterness, but not quite as crisp and to the front as the flavor profile of a PU. A good Boh Pils just the same.
Jedsbrew (465) - Rhineland, Missouri, USA - JAN 26, 2004
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
With a green bottle and yellowed looking label I was expecting the worst but actually things turned out pretty good. The color was dead on with Pilsner Urquell but the head and lacing were not as durable, and it had a pleasant malty spicy aroma. On the short side of medium bodied, smooth and malty with a citrus tang and a mild bready note that developed as it warmed some. The finish lingered and was dry but not at all bitter. This beer definitely had the "Czech" quality to it and was quite drinkable, but seemed a wee bit skinny for a pils.
ThomasE (5176) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - JAN 25, 2004
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
Nice white head, but it dont last long. Fresh but dont have the class of the Urquell
DanielBrown (3717) - Birmingham (via Leicester), West Midlands, ENGLAND - JAN 12, 2004
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Draught, at the Hogshead, Birmingham. Very, very fizzy. Warm blonde colour, with a big, white, frothy head. Unpleasant, sulphur aroma. Metal flavour, quite sweet. Refreshing, but suffers against the other, similar beers which I tried this evening.
OKBeer (1170) - Halifax, Nova Scotia, CANADA - DEC 30, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bright golden colour with a thick but mostly diminishing frothy white head. Strong sour grainy and honey aroma. Clean and crisp with lots of malt presence and a short but nice bitter hit on the finish.
jercraigs (7638) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 26, 2003
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Did this blind in a beer tasting and assumed from the shape of the bottle (they were Christmas wrapped) that it was Pilsener Urquell. Nice malty goldn pilsener, well balanced with a nice amount of hops. Pleasant.
AndersR (195) - Ĺrhus, DENMARK - DEC 5, 2003
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Light fresh pils from Prague (hope the story about where they get their water from isnt true -the river Moldau). Anyway a fine refreshing beer that reminds me alot of Urquel. Lots of hop and bitterness.