2.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20Poured from a bottle, golden, nice. Typical head, some lace.
Aroma: Big time "euro-skunk", not real appealing.
Taste: Not much skunk, surprising. Taste of corn, grass, and a bit of malt. Finishes a bit sour, but, fairly clean.
Not a bad lager, but, not near the best.
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle bought in Benalmadena at a Lidl. Smooth pilsner, hoppy and bitter. Nice czeck pislner, full bodied for a pilsner.
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
aranysárga szín, korrekt, hosszan tartó habkorona, tipikus cseh pilsner illat és ízvilág komló dominanciával; egészen jó szomjoltó
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Hana @ Nothing but the Blues Pub, Budapest. Kaatuu kolpakkoon kullankeltaisena ja kirkkaana, vaahto on hyvin tiivis ja valkoinen, joka säilyy suht hyvin. Haju on mieto, siitä löytyy viljaa, ruohoa, heinäisyyttä ja hieman voita. Maussa jatkuu sama viljaisuus, hiivaleipääkin tulee mukaan. Hieman kukkaisuutta, sitrusta ja voitakin on joukossa. Suutuntuma on yllättävän täyteläinen, ruohoinen humala tuntuu juuri sopivasti. Helppo ja raikas pils, jossa humalointi tsekkiläiseksi yllättävän tuhti.
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
good. My rating system is as follows: bad, meh, good, great, grand, OMG!
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
660ml bottle. Wow, the rating below mine really shocked me, but, each to their own :-) I like its softness compared to the pepperiness of Budvar, one of its ’rivals’. There is a sweet malt and yeasty taste to it, soft lemon aroma, yes there is some faint metallic notes, but for some easy drinking warm weather beer, it’ll do nicely.
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
In the "as a beer rater, you have to take the good with the bad" department, here comes this one, from Wegman’s Collegeville, fortunately only 2 bucks a bottle. Pours (wait for it) clear pale gold. Smells worse than a female skunk-in-heat’s nether regions. Tastes a little better, but not much; a cloying mess of syrupy pale malt, hops, and a sickening metallic finish. One of the worst beers I have ever had the misfortune of drinking (and smelling). This shit provides more suckage than your toothless grandmother. BLECH! My first drain pour in ten years. As a bonus, as it warms I get a HUGE aroma of THC. In hell, they give you a choice of this or Baltika 9.
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
0.5l can. Weak malty aroma. Some sweet strings on tongue in the aftertaste. Very good balance for malt.
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle. this is pretty tangy and industrial tasting. Metallic and thin.
2.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
metalic aroma, fine amber-like color, with a frothy white head. light bitter, light sweet taste. average carbonation, thin texture, and a soft bitter aftertaste.
|
