RateBeer
overall
28
1
style
Serve in Snifter, Tulip

bottled
available

on tap
unknown

Local Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 55   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.78   SEASONAL: Special   IBU: 44   EST. CALORIES: 246   ABV: 8.2%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A generous amount of Mt. Hood hops gives the Diablo a sweet cereal aroma that masks its deceptive nature. This sinfully good ale is true to its name.


3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
anders37 (15537) - MalmŲ, SWEDEN - NOV 13, 2006
Bottle. Clear golden colour with a small white head. Hoppy pine needle aroma. Sweet malty hoppy flavor with some hints of pine needles. Malty hoppy finish with a bitter aftertaste.

3.1
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
BuckNaked (1230) - Tempe, Arizona, USA - NOV 1, 2006
22oz bottle: Pours to a clear light golden body, but this is a clear golden with some quality yellow to it - does not look like a bud light - with a medium white head that is well retained, fading to a medium-sized, bubbly ring around the glass. The aroma is sweet cereal, as advertised, along with some hints of dough and maybe biscuit. I really took some time with the nose and came to detect a minor cat urine scent (not so nice, but probably just one scent from the hops), but the "cat urine" scent actually seems to be better described and broken down into a combination of intensely bitter concetrated grass, bits of apple seed, and hints of a concentrated berry or maybe a raspberry/peach syrup. Itís not really bad, but thereís just not much there for the aroma - it doesnít have to be uber hoppy for me to give it a high score, but it does have to have something more than a mild cereal aroma for this style. Taste is initally....nothing....."wow this one just doesnít have a damned thing going for it"....and then about 2 seconds into the sip the hops hit. Itís interesting to taste for sure, the Mt. Hood hops initially seem to give off a light cut grass flavor, then explode with some bitterness, but this bitterness attack is quite different from the typical cascade/centennial/columbus...etc you might be familiar with for north american IPAís. This flavor is somewhat similar to a hallertau or saaz that you might know from good european lagers - itís bitter, but spicy and floral, along with some hidden fruit notes of strawberries and hay if you let it sit in your mouth for a bit. Mt. Hood is actually bred from Hallertau, so that makes sense in what Iím tasting and smelling. Light-medium bodied, medium carbonation that really does not fatigue the palate, almost feels like itís a cask ale when itís clearly much more carbonated, finishes with some grassy and catty hops that donít have the best aftertaste. This beer seems to be very well brewed but the flavors from the hops are not really that pleasant (though in a milder form they would be excellent in a light lager) so is one of those cases where this beer deserves a high "crafted well" score but is not going to get a very high ratebeer score because the flavors just donít really work well for me. In this case I would prefer a ratebeer "I donít like it" score over a simple "well brewed" one because it adds the judgement of the flavors. Well worth trying and I compliment Steamworks for brewing a high quality beer with Mt. Hood, as itís educational for beer geeks to try and learn more about a particular hop variety. Plus they can brew whatever they damn well please beer geeks aside and this one is pretty neat. Also, as it warms to room temperature the aroma becomes just a bit more fruity and the more I drink, the more it reminds me of orange juice from concetrate. In fact Iím sipping them next to each other and it actually matches up pretty well.....albeit much more bitter and grassy. Canít say much else to make this rating any longer so alright Iíll end it.

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
Bockyhorsey (2609) - Mesa, Arizona, USA - OCT 20, 2006
22 oz. bottle. Didnít have a standout ctirus, floral or pine aroma usually associated with the style. Pale malt aroma. Gold body with decent white head and some lacing. Glavor starts with a bitter bite and a dry grapefruit flavor. Bitter mellows and and body thickens for a good grapefruit peal flavor from middle to finsh. Smooth on the palate alcohol not a factor, slight dry aftertaste but nothing couple swigs of water canít cure.

4.2
   AROMA 8/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 8/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 18/20
GreatLibations (1854) - Last Supper, Arizona, USA - SEP 16, 2006
The biggest session brew around! Pours golden w/ a medium semi creamy froth. Aroma of fresh flowery hop dust. Medium to full nectar w/ soft residual effers. Flavors are suprisingly mellow. Not a malt bomb and not a hop bomb. Subtle yet defined hops, malt, effers, aroma, everything. Not real complex but there is a bright, crispy hop essence w/ a touch of spice. The finish has perfect bittering. Well ballanced and the alcohol is undetectable. Overall: Everyting is subtle, aroma, flavor, finish. This is the biggest session brew ever. This is the only IIPA I could drink two or more 22oz bottles of. You just donít get sick of it. Now, because of itís mellow smoothnes I have to say it doesnít really fit the bill for an IIPA soul seeker. I almost want to call it an Imperial Kolsch. What ever you call it, this brew rocks. The American version of the great Belgian Duvel. Goes good with clam chowder soup and chipotle salmon. This would actually be a good introductory IIPA for a novice.

3.2
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
CaptainCougar (7129) - Columbia, Maryland, USA - APR 11, 2006
Very transparent golden color with a thin ring of white head. Dry earthy aroma is not very hoppy and has a pale malty character. Starts with a nice malty sweetness and has some mild grapefruity flavor hops. Smooth mildly bitter finish has a touch of warming alcohol. Not much of an imperial IPA at all, but still a decent brew.

2.4
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
goldtwins (4320) - Nesconset, New York, USA - FEB 19, 2006
Pours a hazy deep yellow color with a minimal off-white head. Big earhty aroma with a very odd fruit or something that I just canít put my finger on. Not good. Some caramel underneath. Flavor has light floral hop with caramel base. Hop finish is missing. Just not there. This needs a lot more hops in it.

1.9
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
krisbierjaeger (844) - dolores, Colorado, USA - FEB 2, 2006
we got the call at about half past seven, some of the boys were finishing dinner, iíd been working out and was pretty tapped out. it figures. but when you get the call, you go. this one sounded gruesome, a major train wreck. a high-speed double IPA had gone off the track. the dispatcher was wilma, a tough cookie. i figured sheíd just about seen it all-- but when i heard her voice crack, i knew it was going to be a mess. to be honest, some of us kinda saw this coming: the operator was the old steamworks brewing company, and some said theyíd been slack and let a lot of standards slip: over half their fleet of 36 brews still hadnít broken a 3 according to ratebeer inspectors. sure. weíve seen it before: big glitzy restaurant in a ski town, the owners are packiní íem in. but where the rubber meets the road, in the glass, it was too seldom there. jesus. now this was the result. when we got to the scene, we thought weíd misunderstood the call, i mean the beer looked like a wit beer: a milky yellow blob. the head flew off the poor bastard right before our eyes. one rookie broke down there and then, sobbing and puking. we heard a pitiful shriek-- like a donkey being mauled by a cougar. it was the wailing of the aroma! everywhere we sniffed, there was alcohol and toe nail polish. we stood aghast for a moment, almost paralyzed. but finally we did what we were trained to do: we sprang into action. me and the squad leader dug down into the wreckage of the aroma and were able to pull out a note of short bread and pear brandy. it was alive! meanwhile the flavor was slipping away: a hop monster flavor misfired igniting a vat of sweet alcohol. wildly unbalanced, it careened all across the palette and a wealth of strong young mt. hood hops went up in the inferno. my god. there wasnít much we could do, it was like vodka and bitter quinine. we got through the night, but itís a thing i never want to see again. back at the station, i phoned the hospital to ask about those little short bread notes. theyíre doing fine. yeah. but those mt hoods are gone. steamworks will get a slap on the wrist. sigh. and tomorrow is another day.

1.8
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 6/20
Ratman197 (9034) - Arvada, Colorado, USA - JAN 30, 2006
Bomber poured a hazy yellow with a lasting white head. Aromas of cereal,earthy pine and a hint of something similiar to dirty socks. Palate was medium bodied. Flavors of cereal, pine and a hint of citrus with a bitter finish. This is one of the worst DIPAís Iíve ever had!

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
jigglyjock (161) - Seattle, Washington, USA - NOV 26, 2005
This is a weak DIPA. Has the basic flavor of a DIPA (rich malt and piney hops) but the flavor just does not come through. The palate is also quite watery. I would rate this an above average IPA, but one of most disappointing example of DIPA I have had.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
Crosling (1863) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - OCT 17, 2005
Supposedly, this is actually 11%. Light golden color. Mild hop aroma, which is pleasant, although a bit light considering the style. Mild fruits (peach, tangerine), along with alcohol and a very mild hint of chemicals in the aroma as well. I didnít really find the aroma unpleasant, like it seems a lot of others did, but I didnít find it particularly pleasant either. Upon tasting, this is far from anywhere near what I consider a good beer, but Iíve gotta disagree with the other Front Rangers saying that this is terrible, dirty stuff. I at least find this to be drinkable. I donít find the alcohol flavor to be that offputting, but it seems that my palate is less perceptible to alcohol flavor than most, which I definately consider a good thing! The hop flavor is at least interesting, with a piney, floor cleaner blend. There is a somehwhat strange, unpleasant chemical and baby puke flavor and it is grainy as hell, but itís so subtle that iím able to ignore it.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 2 3 4  5  6


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50