burgerlicious (308) - Indianapolis, Indiana, USA - MAY 12, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
a decent beer for getting a bit pished. far smoother than you would expect for a strong malt.
hotstuff (4802) - Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA - MAY 11, 2003
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
This brew poured a medium white somewhat creamy head. There was virtually no lacing on the sides of my glass. There was carbonation rising to the top. Somewhat of a sweet aroma to it. I was not impressed by this brew at all.
foduck (330) - Denton, Texas, USA - APR 27, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
It gets its job done, but it gets nasty if it's not done fast enough. This is just barely above other malt liquors but it's still no St Ides. Grainy, somewhat sulfuric, metallic. Very cheap in Texas.
gws57 (1275) - Saint Charles, Illinois, USA - APR 17, 2003
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
The only thing that saves this beer is that it looks better and more expensive than it is. Other than that, you're better off drinking anything but this.
AustinMilbarge (681) - Denver, Colorado, USA - APR 9, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
This stuff tastes terrible. There is no one character that is able to overcome the overpowering awefulness of this brew. I really think malt liquors are far and away my least favorite style, to date. It is thick tasting and kind of sweet but not good sweet, bad sweet. The one saving grace is that this is cheap. On second thought, if it were expensive then both excuses for not buying a beer (too expensive, doesn't taste good) would hold, you would no longer be able to say "it tastes like ass, but at least it's cheap"
AlabastorJones (814) - Seattle, Washington, USA - APR 9, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: APR 10, 2003 ooooooof, the town drunk is the only one that has the right to be drinking this god awful fluid
JPDIPSO (5450) - Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA - APR 3, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
A truely cheap fine malt liquor. Perhaps a bit oxymorish (sp?). Enough said.
courtney2073 (11) - USA - APR 3, 2003
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I'm sure this was a fine beer before they poured all that rubbing alcohol into it.
clvand0 (350) - Lexington, Kentucky, USA - MAR 2, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
There's nothing special to the appearance nor the aroma of this beer. The taste is pretty poor, but because of the abv, if you can get a few down, you don't really care anymore. The price is really unbeatable ... cheapest beer per alcohol percent when compared to volume. If you want to get drunk cheap, this is absolutely the beer for you.
21iceman40 (1735) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 26, 2003
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2004 Steel Fucking Reserve, i have heard the legend many times but have hoped not to awaken, though Todd called on his name this evening and i was forced to respond. Well pinapples were flyin out the ass, and a dry hopped skunky ass followed. This is from texas, I thought only steers and queers came from texas, now I know that Steers, queers and bad beers come from texas, ye fuckin haw to this.