crizay (1050) - Brook Park, Ohio, USA - MAR 15, 2005
1.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
The best and only way to describe it is a way too overpriced version of Budweiser
GarethYoung (1110) - Glasgow, SCOTLAND - MAR 13, 2005
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: MAR 18, 2005 smells and tastes like every god-awful premium lager in the world. rotten stuff.
RateandPillage (426) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - MAR 13, 2005
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Straw-golden pour with a thick white head. Aroma of hops and some off-aromas as well. On draft, but smells like it came out of a green bottle. Flavor is light on the malt and has the appropriate level of hop bitterness. Once again, there are some off flavors as well.
Cutlass (51) - Galloway, Ohio, USA - MAR 10, 2005
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Overrated. Looks good enough, with a clear gold finish and full head. Bitter taste isn’t too bad, but the aftertaste leaves me reaching for a glass of water afterward. Overall, nothing special.
Kelvinator (32) - Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA - MAR 8, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
I tired the argentinian version brewed by the local Quilmes brewery. Watery, flat, a little dissapointing. Better than average aroma, perhaps fresh and with grassy notes. Too pale. I agree on the unpleasant afterstate.
roder60 (1288) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 7, 2005
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours a pale yellow gold with foamy white head. Aroma is very malty and sweet. Flavor is also very malty and watery. Taste is not very complex, but not totally flat either. Overall, a pretty plain brew.
RichJ7 (1175) - Cullman, Alabama, USA - MAR 5, 2005
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a clear gold with a medium-sized fluffy white head. Aroma is of sweet malt. The flavor is sweet and malty upfront with a bitter hop finish and a slightly metallic taste that is unpleasant. A decent enough beer, but the finish almost ruins it.
danielhanefelt (25) - brabrand, DENMARK - MAR 4, 2005
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A watery and slightly bitter pilsner beer. Light standard colour. Very similar to Tuborg pilsner in every aspect. A refreshing but boring beer - would be fine on a hot summers day.
mephisto (1278) - TAIWAN - MAR 3, 2005
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: MAR 13, 2005 my second most consumed beer after jupiler. again, what a waste of my time in belgium. but it’s quite nice. i really wouldn’t mind drinking it even today if the supermarkets are not charging $14 + tax for 12 pack. damn, i used to pay like 180 belgian francs for 24 bottles. (250 ml i recall) that’s like $6 for 24.
CampbellWilson (533) - SCOTLAND - MAR 2, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Okay, so its a mass produced crowd pleaser from a huge multinational and I’m not supoposed to like it. However I’m hard up this week and 24 330ml bottles cost £10.99. And its still beer. Lager hop aroma (saaz?), hint of sulphur, grass, but not unpleasant. Taste fairly flavoursome, not too bland, finish fairly hoppy. Its not that bad, far better than the Millers, Budweisers, Carlings that I’ve tasted.