Winefly (60) - KEW, AUSTRALIA - FEB 9, 2004
3.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Liked it..the freshness and its cool factor was just right in the heat here in Australia. Better than most Aussie lagers. On tap almost anywhere in Melbourne.
dirtyc (173) - Erie, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 8, 2004
2.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 14/20
very expensive beer, great taste, great beer for one of those chill nights to just hang with the guys
hopscotch (9388) - Vero Beach, Florida, USA - FEB 7, 2004
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: NOV 16, 2006 On tap at Ned Divine’s... Crystal clear, light yellow lager. Mild butterscotch and floral notes. Good bitterness. Light-bodied with a thin, watery mouthfeel and fizzy carbonation. Short, bitter finish. Why the f**k are they brewing a lager in Belgium? Just so BMC people can say they liked something exotic?
ThomasE (5176) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - FEB 7, 2004
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 16/20
Clear golden colour with big foamy, but shortlived head. Aroma is mostly hops. Flavor is sweet with just slight bitterness. Palate is perfect.
piscator34 (1980) - Winnipeg, Manitoba, CANADA - FEB 4, 2004
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
An overpriced, but generally reliable pilsner. It doesn't smell much like anything. Straw yellow in colour, and a fair amount of carbonation. It tastes dry... perhaps even a bit bland, with just a hint of malt. Not bad, but there's usually something better to be had for the price.
fly (1419) - austin, Tejas, Alabama, USA - FEB 3, 2004
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Midlle of the road. Middle of the road.
Why do we have to do it in the
Middle of the road?
VA Homebrewer (525) - Portsmouth, Virginia, USA - FEB 3, 2004
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not much more than an typical, run of the mill lager. Fluffy white head, crystal clear pale golden/yellow color. Not much discernable aroma. Mild malt flavor, no hoppiness. Nothing offensive in this beer, but not much good. Ho-hum.
hershiser2 (1228) - Charlottesville, Virginia, USA - FEB 2, 2004
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
WAY overpriced import.
Light golden yellow, small head... Appearances can be deceiving... and this one is, as it's the best thing about the beer.
Not much of a smell...
Taste... well, it reminded me too much of Corona with the lime added. I can't see playing $4.00 a bottle at the bar for this for the same taste as a crappy corona.
Yea it's drinkable, but definitely not worth it. You want this taste? Get a corona. You want a good taste, get something else.
SiddFinch (155) - Pen Argyl, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 1, 2004
2.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
First time I've had this. Was expecting something more. No aroma and little flavor, but true to the style.
badgerben (4493) - Blaine, Minnesota, USA - JAN 29, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Light, almost clear golden. Little head. I couldn't smell much, but it was getting later in the evening. Taste was of some citrus fruit, maybe grass. No real taste here.