MiP (14481) - Sønderborg, DENMARK - DEC 19, 2004
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Can. Very dark colour with a blue head (I must admit the light was a bit dodgy). Boring lager with slightly more body than usual.
AAO (102) - Næstved, DENMARK - DEC 13, 2004
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Oxfordbackpackers. ligth golden color. Middle white head, nice head taste! Weak aroma, malt. Bitter malty powerfull taste.
Lubiere (11232) - Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA - DEC 10, 2004
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Draft. Golden lager with a thick big bubbled white head. Corny grassy aroma. Lightly sweet malt and adjuncts with a wee bit more hops than you mass produced swill. Body is medium, but beer is damned boring...and expensive (6.50 a pilsner glass at Pied de Cochon.)
richlikebeer (838) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 9, 2004
1.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
If people decided what beer to drink on smell alone, no one would ever drink this beer. I can’t even describe the scent...just that it was awful. The beer itself is a pale yellow with a foamy white head, but not what I expect from a lager. I guess the taste was ok, but again, not what I expected...alot of hops, with only a few bits of malts and a decent amount of bitterness. Very thin body, and the aftertaste matched the original flavor. If you are going to pay for an import, get a Duvel.
sfontain (845) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - DEC 7, 2004
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Ehh, who let the skunk loose? Light yellow, lots of bubbles, decent, white, foamy head. A little hops in the aroma to accompany the skunk. Flavor is just weird...I guess some malts, but a pretty good hop hit. Thin; watery. Will never buy again.
ALyseen (42) - DENMARK - DEC 3, 2004
1.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Tap. fresh malt flavor. a boring lager. and a bad belgian. one is enought of those.
beerandrugby (210) - Nashville, Tennessee, USA - DEC 3, 2004
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
A little boring, but refreshing. Too thin. I wouldn’t have it again. I don’t see how lagers are becomming so popular in the southern UK when there are quality ales on draft and usually cask!
tplindler (37) - California, USA - DEC 3, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Solid lager. Slightly bitter but not overwhelming. Best when served quite cold. Watch the sell by date. The closer the bottle is, there’s a tendency to get quite bitter and unpalatable.
Hmright (101) - Annapolis, Maryland, USA - NOV 29, 2004
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Hyped as some sort of crazy alcohol content super beer. Not really that impressive. Kinda sweet, with a bitter finish. Hoppy with a honey hint of flavor. Not looking forward to taking the next sip, but had to choke it down for the price.
barenada (211) - Georgetown, Indiana, USA - NOV 28, 2004
1.6 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
(draft) I asked for a Belgian and got this awful thing. I don’t like lagers, and this was a pretty bad lager. Bland mixed with boring.