Jahills (151) - Cambridge (Hobart), AUSTRALIA - OCT 11, 2003
2.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: NOV 21, 2003 Smelt like Becks, a little bit off. nice clean amber colour but a very thin if not any head. tasted good enough with a nice sharp lingering aftertaste. Not bad but would have to better for me to go back there regulary.
y0cola (361) - fremont, California, USA - OCT 10, 2003
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
tasted in croatia. smelled skunky. tasted pretty skunky too. I didnt feel i had to get another bottle that was fresh to fully capture the beer's spirit.
Winchester (75) - Struggle Town NSW, AUSTRALIA - OCT 9, 2003
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: OCT 10, 2003 On tap, terrible. Out of the stubby, terrific. One of many beers where the quality from stubby to tap is poles apart.
bfgill (120) - Tasmania, AUSTRALIA - OCT 6, 2003
3.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
When I first drank this, i didnt have much to go on. There is a lack of any real aroma and the taste surprised me. It is rich from the barley,a smooth, slightly fruity pilsener than is finished off nicely with some bouncing hops - a good lager. cheers
Kalli (502) - Falun, SWEDEN - OCT 5, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: FEB 15, 2004 So here goes my first rating. Starting with my favourite lager might not be wise, but it might be informative also.
The appearance is nothing special, nice golden colour but the head soon vanishes. There is little in the way of smell, but what is is inoffensive.
It does have a good body for a lager and although I wouldn't mind more flavour it has a nice bitterness that most lagers lack.
Still, one of the best regular lager I know of and a good allrounder.
Rerated: this wasn't a very traumatic revisitation. More yellow golden than I remembered and even less head. Left some lacing though. Slight inoffencive aroma.
Nice hop profile, but I'd like to see the adjuncts (corn/maize) give way to a little more maltiness. That way this would be really good. As is, still better than most macro lagers, but overpriced.
MMM...Beer (385) - Las Vegas, Nevada, USA - OCT 5, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
I'm not too sure what's going on, but lately I've really been enjoying Belgium beers. I used to not care for them much at all. Stella has a wonderful taste that it smooth and suttle on the palate with just a hint of fruitness. A great beer to enjoy with a brat and while watching the Cubs kick a$$.
lasonovich (151) - AUSTRALIA - OCT 3, 2003
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A crystal clear easy drinking smooth pilsener that is only lacking in a little bit of flavour. Best on a hot day and better than most other european mainstream beers.
Zoob (85) - Bakersfield, California, USA - OCT 1, 2003
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Crystal clear and yellow. Nice hop nose, I assume saaz, but not 100% Light body not as grainy as say Urquel, good lace.
drismyhero (815) - Tacoma, Washington, USA - SEP 29, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Absolutely crystal clear, concise, boring-ass pilsner. That's simple what this was. There is nothing here to be taken away, it seems like the epitome of what a pilsner has to be, but not what it can be, if that makes sense.
bu11zeye (11940) - Frisco (Dallas), Texas, USA - SEP 26, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: JUL 5, 2004 Based on draught version: golden color, thin head, average tasting pilsner. Fairly common pub beer in western Europe and Africa.