CampbellWilson (533) - SCOTLAND - MAR 2, 2005
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Okay, so its a mass produced crowd pleaser from a huge multinational and Iím not supoposed to like it. However Iím hard up this week and 24 330ml bottles cost £10.99. And its still beer. Lager hop aroma (saaz?), hint of sulphur, grass, but not unpleasant. Taste fairly flavoursome, not too bland, finish fairly hoppy. Its not that bad, far better than the Millers, Budweisers, Carlings that Iíve tasted.
Walt (2449) - Austin, Texas, USA - MAR 1, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Poured yellow with a big white head...very malty lager...nothing special here...
SwedeDog (364) - Windsor, Connecticut, USA - FEB 26, 2005
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
Draft. You know, I used to like this beer. Then I went to Belgium.
Belgian Bud just doesnít cut it anymore
Borrrris (110) - LINDENHURST, New York, USA - FEB 23, 2005
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. I was expecting crisp and clean and maybe a little light.Instead, found it to have a citrus/metallic note that comes of as kinda skunky, further muddling a nothing special beer. Another marketing scam. I wonder if GM markets Chevy Cavaliers as luxury imports in Korea?
BUY AGAIN? No
kyzr (1375) - Montana, USA - FEB 23, 2005
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
White head with golden color. Nose of the European cheap lagers. Flavor of same, very light and nothing too special. Clean finish.
DogfishKing (22) - USA - FEB 21, 2005
1.8 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
skunky.....not good at all. high price, poor flavor. overall i was very unpleased. dont think i will ever purchase it again
SSSteve (4006) - - FEB 18, 2005
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: APR 30, 2007 has a mild skunky aroma. yellow in color. very fizzy head. tastes like your usual imported green bottle lager. nothing special. WAY too overpriced.
iambeer (255) - Ontario, CANADA - FEB 18, 2005
3.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20
It seems to tase better in a tin, agreeable for lager. Alas overpriced, for a market saturated with mediocre lagers, it fits right in. Better then Canadian, but what does that say?
harperwood9 (16) - milton, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 15, 2005
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Marketing Guru set this up. An average beer at best, sold to the masses as better than the rest????? Funky glass makes it better then it actually is! Taste is íso-soí
Stew41 (1927) - Phuket, THAILAND - FEB 11, 2005
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Light gold with thin head that has ok retention. Boring nose, some citrus and malt. Similar in the palate with some malt, slightly stale, but is overridden with a dilutive note. Itís amazing in Oz retail that soooo many punters this beer is the business.