dhlesq (233) - Thousand Oaks, California, USA - FEB 2, 2005
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: MAR 13, 2006 Faint aroma of corn and hops. Appears as crystal clear straw color with a creamy white head that dissipates quickly but leaves tons of lacing, along with a noticeable effervescence of medium-large bubbles. Flavor of light malt, followed up with strong hop bitterness. Apropriately thin palate that makes this beer light, bright, and refreshing.
iam (369) - Mississauga, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 1, 2005
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a clear straw colour with a thin head. Malt and adjunct aromas.Taste is pretty run-of-the-mill. Alright but nothing I’d go out of my way for.
lamas (1551) - Washington DC, USA - JAN 27, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Best before date: 01/05. Pours a bright gold with thin white head that dissipates quickly. Aroma is hoppy. Taste is fairly balanced. A little on the hoppy side. Pretty bland. There is a weird chemical aftertaste though. Not too much better than swill beers.
Garrat (1332) - Suffolk, ENGLAND - JAN 26, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
From A Bottle,Tap.Dark yellow in colour,cold,fizzy,chemical aroma.I have heard it called wife beater,I don’t think I could drink enough of this to find out if it’s true.
joshpiledean (316) - Seattle, Washington, USA - JAN 24, 2005
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
On tap. Light gold pour, small head. Pretty boring aroma. Flavor is also boring, just some skunky saaz and light sweetness, light feel, but honestly, the best lager I think I’ve had in a long time. Very easy going and not too light to be boring.
LilKem (1213) - Marietta, Ohio, USA - JAN 22, 2005
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
this was aight. more skunky than i expected. i had it at an upscale place in manhattan which had some decent brews on tap so i guess i expected more. no flavor, just kind of carbonated and boring. slight citrus hint but not much. kind of watered down, which was disappointing.
BCAR (222) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - JAN 22, 2005
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Status Quo brew or "How to brew the mildest beer that we can market the hell out of and push on mainstream
America?" pretty boring. This is not why I drink beer.
AndrewGeoff (27) - AUSTRALIA - JAN 21, 2005
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
A clear golden colour with quite a nice head for this style of beer. The aroma is basically insipid with nothing bad but nothing to recommend it either. It is clean and crisp on the palate and has just a vague hint of hop bitterness balanced by a mild sweetness. It finishes clean but unremarkable. Overall it doesn’t offend, it is better than some, but basically it’s BORING! I refuse to pay well over the price of a local lager just to be bored!
RAYBOY01 (2012) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - JAN 17, 2005
1.9 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: JAN 18, 2005 Seems like a long way to go for a beer that is just like every boring domestic already here. I can’t think of one good reason to spend $1.50 more for this than an MGD, when I can’t think of a good reason to buy an MGD in the first place. Best thing I can say is it doesn’t take too long or involve much distraction to drink one.
beastdog75 (363) - Brick, New Jersey, USA - JAN 15, 2005
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Although sometimes referred to as a "Budweiser of Belgium," this is a decent pils type of brew. Had good pale maltiness to it, with some grassy/citric hop presence. Easy to drink.