xmandax (130) - Astoria, New York, USA - MAR 10, 2003
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
this one was disappointing. for whatever reason, i was under the impression that this was a great brew and had always meant to have one. now that i have i don't ever plan to again. not much aroma and an extremely thin body. the flavor was thin as well with no discernable hop and only the slightest bit of malt. one of my least favorite beers ever.
80skid (65) - New York, USA - MAR 2, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Not a bad brew. Nothing terribly special about the flavor due to its mild character although what flavor there is, is quite good. Clean and dry aftertaste. Great beer to drink while just kicking back and relaxing. Better than Beck's although somewhat similar.
Boystout (1000) - Chisinau, MOLDOVA - MAR 2, 2003
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Nice and clean standard lager, refreshing and quite good. Sometimes I have a feeling that it's brewed in every country in Europe.
007lund (92) - Ann Arbor, USA - MAR 2, 2003
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Grainy aroma with a long finish. A bit bitter. I don't know why everyone on this website hates on lagers- they're not my favorite, but they're not deplorable. For a lager, this is not a bad beer.
BeaverBrown (245) - Portland, Oregon, USA - MAR 1, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This pale yellow beer looks like a Budweiser. Pale yellow. Smells skunky but doesn't have much flavor.
krdktq (17) - Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 28, 2003
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A DECENT BEER THAT IS VERY DRINKABLE. IF YOU EXPECT A GREAT BEER YOU WILL BE DISSAPOINTED. I WOULD DRINK IT AGAIN.
21iceman40 (1731) - vienna, West Virginia, USA - FEB 28, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not really all that impressive, a glorified bud or mgd. Had it off the tap, but it still tasted like a straight up pils. Nothing more do I have to say.
Stevesvitalogy (6) - ENGLAND - FEB 25, 2003 does not count
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not my favorite beer. The first time I had it (bottle) it was a bit shit. I think it's better off tap or out of a can.
mds (2207) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 25, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUN 13, 2004 Had it the other day at school on tap. fairly decent as far as lagers go. No evident hop flavour. Low bitterness. Unbalanced.
IslandHaole (1091) - Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa-Ken, JAPAN - FEB 25, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Regular golden pils with huge chunky white head. Skunky aroma (damned green bottles) Not much flavor. Thin and watery. Some hop bitterness. The worst beer brewed in Belgium I've had so far. With so many good ones, why bother with this?