beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - APR 3, 2004
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Ah, the great and notorious Stella Artois. It will always be there for you. A smooth drink, only slightly watery, but always a reliable benchmark of getting messed up by degrees. Stella floods the UK market, by far the biggest beer sold over there. What amazes me is how such a hugely common popular brew in England is considered something of a posh beer here. In any event, Stella has a mild taste and nice light amber color. Not too distinctive, but certainly trustworthy.
zach8270 (4022) - Henrietta, New York, USA - APR 3, 2004
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: DEC 11, 2008 [draft - Airport Marriott - Greece, NY] Pours a faint straw yellow with a decent white head, good carbonation and good lacing. Has a bit of a skunky aroma to it. Crisp taste with a slightly bitter aftertaste to it. A bit reminiscent of Heineken, but not as bitter.
whaleman (2178) - North Wales, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 1, 2004
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Straw body and loose soapy white head. Nutty, grassy, skunky aroma. Crisp, flavorful, and fairly easy to drink but has some Heineken stink breath qualities. Still, I can't help but think that the world would be a better place if the Budmilloors masses converted to Stella.
newfoundweed (9) - Dar es salaam, TANZANIA - MAR 31, 2004 does not count
3.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
The clear and crispy taste, backsup its tasty appearance and style, with a nice thick white head.
jcc83 (137) - Athens, Georgia, USA - MAR 26, 2004
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I was excited by the appearance of this beer upon first pouring it -- it poured an attractive golden shade with streams of bubbles and a good thick white head -- but I was let down by the aroma and flavor I experienced thereafter. Aroma was pleasantly hoppy but weak, and the same was true of the flavor. The brew was quite refreshing, but it simply lacked the strength of flavor that I was hoping for. Not a bad beer at all, but it just doesn't live up to its appearance or its reputation.
sayravai (4708) - Helsinki, FINLAND - MAR 22, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JAN 6, 2005 (Bottled) Very pale golden color, largeish head with big bubbles and lace. Very mild, hoppy and somewhat fruity aroma. Citric-hoppy, slightly malty flavor with a sugary, slightly harshly bitter finish and no aftertaste. Light-bodied, quite smooth palate with balanced carbonation. A very easily drinkable, but not watery lager, with hints of the fruitiness of some lighter Belgian blondes. Not that bad, although it has no real taste to offer.
NewYawker (15) - New York, New York, USA - MAR 20, 2004
3.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
I can see from other reveiws that this isn't very popular, but I disagree. Nice yellow color with plenty of carbonation, good crisp flavor of malt and nice hops. I could drink this beer all night.
wpp83 (64) - Athens, Georgia, USA - MAR 18, 2004
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Poured a head that looked like a glob of spit, which surprisingly lasted the whole beer. Had a buttery aroma, warm bitter flavor. Nice old beer. I would have it again, though not my favorite
MullMan (1099) - New York, USA - MAR 15, 2004
2.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
poured to a pint glass from a tap. thin white head and bright yellow color. little to no aroma, medium fizz, and light grassy taste. it's funny that Belgium exports this, but since it's in a lot of bars now I'm assuming this is driving a lot of revenue, so good for them.
SilkTork (5542) - Southampton, United Kingdom, Hampshire, ENGLAND - MAR 14, 2004
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: APR 3, 2007 June 2002 Bottle. This is a lager that I have recently developed a taste for as an everyday cooler. It has no distinguishing features, is steady and reliable and leaves no nasty tastes. It is also quite reassuringly cheap. What more praise can one give?! The Ford Mondeo of lagers! Give that man a Stella! [2.5]
March 2004. Bottle. Head to Head with Baltika Classic. Both are yellow. A big hit of sharp prickly rubber with the Baltika. Both have a co2 aroma. More hops in the Stella - a better balance of what flavour there is. Nothing obscene about the Stella - it’s drinkable. Stella beats the Russian. [1.9]
Dec, 2006 Bottle. Drinkable, slightly biscuity pale lager. No big off-flavours, though no character either. Mild, dry, soapy bitterness in the finish. Hoppier than the average global lager. Compared side by side with Skol and Carlsberg. Acceptable. [2.5]
April, 2007Tap, Clarendon, Gillingham A salty finish. An awareness of bitterness. Neutral. Drinkable. Assertive but not aggressive fizz. [2.3]