21iceman40 (1732) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - FEB 28, 2003
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Not really all that impressive, a glorified bud or mgd. Had it off the tap, but it still tasted like a straight up pils. Nothing more do I have to say.
Stevesvitalogy (6) - ENGLAND - FEB 25, 2003 does not count
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not my favorite beer. The first time I had it (bottle) it was a bit shit. I think it's better off tap or out of a can.
mds (2250) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - FEB 25, 2003
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
UPDATED: JUN 13, 2004 Had it the other day at school on tap. fairly decent as far as lagers go. No evident hop flavour. Low bitterness. Unbalanced.
IslandHaole (1091) - Yokosuka-Shi, Kanagawa-Ken, JAPAN - FEB 25, 2003
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Regular golden pils with huge chunky white head. Skunky aroma (damned green bottles) Not much flavor. Thin and watery. Some hop bitterness. The worst beer brewed in Belgium I've had so far. With so many good ones, why bother with this?
beerluvindave (194) - Canonsburg, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 23, 2003
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A bit on the burnt side with the malt, but good otherwise... Not very impressed with the head or lack of complexity.
DrunkAsASkunk (847) - Lynnwood, Washington, USA - FEB 22, 2003
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This one was about as middle of the frickin road as they get. Poured on tap at lucky baldwins, it came out a uriney colored yellow mass with a weenie little white head and very little carbonation apparent. It smelled super funky...just like a Eureka beer...with wheaty, grainy, breadym doughiness and a slight malt being apparent. It had a rather boring, clean and watery wheat/honey taste about it. It was putting me to sleep it was so boring. Clean ending, but nothing to the body at all....next!!!!!
DaSilky1 (2606) - San Diego, California, USA - FEB 22, 2003
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pissly transparentness..nice head though..smells like budweiser but tasted like budweiser with some peaches and nectarine puree'd and slopped on top...although in the end..its lagery poo.
Voivod (304) - Como, ITALY - FEB 21, 2003
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale golden colour, decent head. Hoppy aroma. the taste is has some malty sweetness, with an hoppy, quite bitter aftertaste. A regular commercial pilsener: not bad, but nothing special.
microdyke (360) - Portland, Oregon, USA - FEB 19, 2003
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Clear pale golden color with a bubbly and frothy head. A little wheaty aroma and some skunk. A taste of skunkiness and a nip of floral notes. I really am not a pilsner fan, but thought I would give it a try.
glider (57) - Shrub Oak, New York, USA - FEB 19, 2003
4.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Even out of the bottle, this is one of the cleanest, freshest tasting brews I've had in a long time. Pretty dry too. Goes down real smoothly, and one of the few brews I can drink at least a six of.