Poodu99 (5) - Exeter, - APR 4, 2002 does not count
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Itís okay, but after the first pint you start to wish you hadnít started. After a number more you wish you werenít born.
WillyTheFrog99 (31) - Durham, New Hampshire, USA - APR 1, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
A light and tasty Pilsner, a nice offering from Interbrew. Bubbly and crisp, and served with the foil on the bottle like champagne. Mm-mm.
aracauna (3179) - Georgia, USA - APR 1, 2002
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not bad for a Pilsner. First sip actually pretty good, but it got blander the closer I got to the bottom of the glass.
heykevin (1280) - Decorah, Iowa, USA - MAR 28, 2002
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Vaguely skunky megaeuropils. Served on draft so being lightstruck is not an excuse. Marginally better than Heineken Iíd say, but that isnít really much of a compliment.
ToadMan (559) - Washington, Washington DC, USA - MAR 25, 2002
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I guess I just dont like Pilsners, I would only put this half a notch above Bud.
Volgon (2763) - Manchester, New Hampshire, USA - MAR 25, 2002
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: AUG 29, 2006 Not-quite hazy yellow/amber body with a fast moving head. Light flowery aroma, crisp, clean, and ends slightly bitter. Old rating: I tried to find a bottle without dust, or under a light or covered in slime, but it tasted horribly lightstruck. Eh. It beats the hell out of about 90% of the beer drank in America, but as you all know, that ainít saying much.
rauchbier (3640) - Isle Of Beer, Lincolnshire, ENGLAND - MAR 25, 2002
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Sold as a premium brand here in the U.K., but all that means is it costs more and is strong. To the average U.K. drinker 4.5% abv is strong. Aroma and flavour is muted although hints of hop are apparent. The head lasts about a nanosecond. Overall the beer is probably worth of the ípremiumí tag as it is far superior to any English lagers. It has a soft smooth palate and aftertaste and doesnt have the nasty aftertaste of many other stronger lagers that just seem to have a couple of bags of brewing sugar thrown in to boost the alcohol.
DubbelO7 (42) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 24, 2002
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Good beer for the money... at least here in Western Canada ...
I moved up to here from the Eastern U.S. and never was willing to pay what was being charged for it in Pennsylvania.
It seems to be a beer of choice here, cheap cheap and cheap again .
reminds me of Heineken etcetra yet not as caustic.
kwik-lime (1429) - London, Greater London, ENGLAND - MAR 23, 2002
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: JUN 22, 2013 Ubiquitously popular, relatively well-hopped but somewhat grainy and overly gassy lager. There are worse out there.
neilrichards (191) - Leicestershire, ENGLAND - MAR 20, 2002
3.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
A good, crisp lager. The drink of choice in most, city center pubs. Enjoyable at any time.