cdeaton (66) - Madison, Indiana, USA - MAR 7, 2008
2.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Yellow pour, actually nice head, potent hoppy aroma. Very metallic, very one-dimensional. Overrated.
jimbonga (65) - - DEC 4, 2015
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Bottle. Insipidly pale with very little aroma, and what there is is of damp cardboard with a hint of straw. Sweet and thin with a little bit of hop but quite an unpleasant aftertaste. I expected it to be more inoffensive (long time since I last had any) but it’s almost unpleasant. Got to be better mass market lagers than this.
80skid (65) - New York, USA - MAR 2, 2003
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Not a bad brew. Nothing terribly special about the flavor due to its mild character although what flavor there is, is quite good. Clean and dry aftertaste. Great beer to drink while just kicking back and relaxing. Better than Beck's although somewhat similar.
TomSpears (65) - Norfolk, ENGLAND - MAR 24, 2005
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
People call this wife-beater or some such unpleasant name. The common drink of tramps and low-lifes. Yet it has a classy advert on the TV. And the tag-line "Reasurringly Expensive". It’s a decent enough drink. Much cheaper in France where it seems to be regarded as the common and everyday beer that it is.
cowboy7096 (64) - Arlington, Texas, USA - FEB 27, 2006
3.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
a local resurant had this as a draft, and it really wasn’t that bad. aroma.. wasn’t special, the appearance was a perfect yellow amber beer color, the falvor is kind of hard to explain. It’s like a pale lager with a slight kick. A lot better than what most places have to offer (altleast ot the lower end of the scale). I would pick this beer over most any places that bad just basics.
TexasAggie12 (64) - Burnet, Texas, USA - MAY 4, 2006
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
nice golden color. Slight skunky aroma. Taste was a little grainy with malt and citric flavor. Finished with a bit of dry hoppy flavor. Over all was expectimg more with all the hype of had 600 years to get this beer right. Good beer but dose not live up to the hype.
wpp83 (64) - Athens, Georgia, USA - MAR 18, 2004
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Poured a head that looked like a glob of spit, which surprisingly lasted the whole beer. Had a buttery aroma, warm bitter flavor. Nice old beer. I would have it again, though not my favorite
voiceofreason (64) - New Jersey, USA - OCT 2, 2009
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
UPDATED: OCT 27, 2009 Re-rate: 4.5 to 5 after another glorious
Draught at Yankee Stadium
Stella, I love you
Ffelipe (64) - BRAZIL - AUG 1, 2015
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
Cerveja de massa, sem sabor tampouco aroma, não vale o preço, nem para sr beber em altas quantidades
Dimitri99 (63) - USA - OCT 2, 2004
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Ooh, I liked this one. It was tasty.
I remember it as flavorful, with a good taste. The bottle it came in seemed very "upper class" if you will, and it was actually kind of a pain in the ass to get open... but very enjoyable none the less.