tomthompson89 (1976) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - OCT 23, 2006
2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
never will... never have... dont think ever want to like this over priced bland skunky lager
mlb06uk (6) - ENGLAND - OCT 25, 2006 does not count
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Although i like this lager, its abit too bold, as you only get the first nice sip, then the strong beer after taste. It looks good, strong yellow colour, not very bubbly, with big head
biggmike (480) - Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA - OCT 27, 2006
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Typical pale lager except for the price. Can find myriad beers in this price range that are way superior. Better than Bud or Miller, but thats not really saying a hell of a lot, is it? Do yourself a favor if you like this style and buy a Pilsner Urquell and save some money, AND have a better beer.
hophead75 (2012) - Largo, Florida, USA - NOV 13, 2006
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
bottle. light clear and straw colored. lively carbonation. Aroma is grainy and lightly sweet, not much in the way of hops. Taste is lightly sweet and grainy, with a clean finish. better than the macro lagers bud miller coors but not something I personally would drink very often.
rayg1 (586) - Charlotte, North Carolina, USA - DEC 2, 2006
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Not bad, not great. Poured a clear yellow at the bar with a thin white head. Got this because my friend loves it and she recomended it. I liked it better then most
American macros a little yeasty action going on in there and then the refreshing crisp finish. Not a bad session beer for the money.
mcnally (114) - Burbank, California, USA - JAN 21, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
What a disappointment this beer was...yellow pour, with a big pure white head that reminded me of wool. Skunky corn aroma. Not much taste, except for the bit that hits you in the finish. Watery.
bigcat03 (259) - Columbus, Nebraska, USA - JAN 31, 2007
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Draught from The Outlook poured into a really tall ass mug - Pours gold with a 1 finger frothy white head; Lots of malt to the nose with a hint of some hops; TONS of malt along with corn and rice on the initial taste; Some light grassy hops on the aftertaste; Watery body; Little carbonation for a pale lager; Basic. No biggie.
boFNjackson (4199) - Portland, Oregon, USA - FEB 8, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
UPDATED: NOV 17, 2011 I think this beer is overrated and underrated at the same time. Itís very overrated by people who arenít into beer too much, but itís also made lesser by a lot of connoisseurs. IMO, Itís a perfectly moderate beer. It has a lot of flavor and body for a pale lager. Unfortunately, at some bars, this may be the best they have. And I would much rather have this than Heineken or Amstel and what not.
Dixon (31) - Iowa, USA - MAR 20, 2007
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This beer was highly recommended by several other drinkers during a night out and I guess it just demonstrates how different my tastes are from the ímainstreamí, because I did not care for it at all. It smelled and tasted skunky and had no body to it. I will probably not drink it again.
buckybeer (666) - Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA - MAR 21, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
UPDATED: APR 5, 2007 Aroma of fresh road kill skunk with its piss sack still swaying in the breeze. So why did I give the aroma a three?? Skunk aroma reminds me of spring time. The flavor however is not too shabby. A tart citrus with a light hop finish.