Papsoe (25088) - Frederiksberg, DENMARK - MAY 16, 2005
3.2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
UPDATED: JUL 2, 2005 (Bottle 33 cl) Dear God, only upon my return from Belgium did I notice, that this beer had an expiry date in January 2001! That is a beer more than 4 years too old. Normally this is totally devastating for a lager, but well, well, well... Amber-coloured, slightly hazy, flat head with large, odd bubbles. Incredible almost smoked malty notes and then a fantastic aroma of sherry - not madeira. Short, dry bitterness in the palate. A unique experience indeed! Bought from André Paeleman in his tavern in Wetteren - and a close rival to his own Uitzet beer... 160505
kyuss (21) - BELGIUM - MAR 24, 2005
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Only had it once, liked it more than the normal stella artois. Flavor was excellent (for a lager, that is).
johninmelb (1126) - Bristol, Gloucestershire, ENGLAND - DEC 17, 2002
3.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
A nice dry standard lager. Very good on a hot day for a big thirst.
fatherpierre (62) - Leeds, ENGLAND - APR 7, 2002
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
A decent bottled beer. Not so much dry though. More of a less offensive taste than normal stella, but strangly stronger though.
Bov (9467) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - JAN 28, 2002
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
the label says: ’without aftertaste’ as if it was the ultimate marketing argument. Ridiculous and tragic at the same time ... - transparent golden colour, fine head, few hop presence, crisp and fresh, dry and short finish. After all, it was not as bad as the label said it was !