michael-pollack (4960) - King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 7, 2003
3.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Aroma, what aroma? Great drinking porter, although not what one mught expect. A 'light porter,' this beer is more like an ESB as far as I am concerned...none of that choclate/coffee tast you get in American porter.
Gusler (2653) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - JAN 26, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
The pour a cloudless sangrineous color, the head slight, and the lace patchy. The nose is mostly malt, fresh and clean smelling with the start thickly malt, lightly sweet and the top middling in its mouth feel. Finish is penetratingly acidic, the hops toothsome, also a bit vinous and lightly tart, the aftertaste exquisitely dry and long lasting. Different front the run of the mill porters, and the 6.5% ABV adds a bit of warmth to the tummy, well worth a sample, as a change of pace from the American Style Porters.
Ni209 (67) - Tennessee, USA - JAN 25, 2003
3.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
the one thing that stood out with this beer was that it was flat. i mean FLAT, like water. maybe it was old or something, but i found it very interesting. otherwise, i think it would have been awesone with some fizz. maybe next time...
iwantalambic (1478) - St. Louis, Missouri, USA - JAN 18, 2003
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pours a redish brown. . .large frothy beige head that exudes a huge malty banana aroma. Cloves and more bananas make up a mostly sweet malty flavour, that doesn't have the mouth feel or the taste of a porter.
Crit (3420) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - DEC 12, 2002
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Red amber, huge off white head. Sweet perfumey nose. Dry malt flavor with no noticeable alcohol heat. Bland
JB99 (27) - Dallas, Texas, USA - OCT 16, 2002
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 18/20
I agree with psychprof on this one it’s alot like one of my homebrews that was intended to be a dubbel but I used a different yeast. This on is a very nice brew but not my idea of a porter maybe the monks had a few toomany themselves when they made labeled this one, but a cool bottle and I don’t know the alcohol level but it is up there as most belgiums are.
YogiBeera (2510) - New Jersey, USA - SEP 19, 2002
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Sweet malty aroma with hints of alcohol and clay. Red brown body with a little head. Flavor very thin with malt, alcohol, hops, cumin and plums. Thin finish but bitter. Great Stonebottle.
pivo (2603) - GERMANY - SEP 19, 2002
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Sweet, roaste malt nose - almost like malt extract for homebrewing. A little alcohol comes through too. Dark caramel color - very attractive. Tastes of plums, raisins, and sugar that is spiced with cinnamom. Just a slight bitter touch. Dry end. Round mougth feel. A little artificially sweet somehow - maybe too sweet?
Ringo (963) - Loveland, Colorado, USA - AUG 22, 2002
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
It’s not great, but pretty good. Thin for a ’porter.’ Not worth the price unless you want the bottle to make some Martha Stewart-like craft project. Number 300 for me, no significance though.
Drinkingdan (375) - East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA - AUG 18, 2002
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
I thought the color was a little light and the texture was thin for a porter, but it was very good and enjoyable. And hey the bottle kicks ass!!