TomDecapolis (4546) - Milton, Delaware, USA - DEC 28, 2012
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours a translucent brownish amber with a smaller bubbly white head. Aroma of toffee, dark fruits cardboard and some
Hints of pepper. Flavor of dark fruits, toffee, brown sugar, Belgian yeast spices.
arminjewell (6433) - Lansing, Michigan, USA - DEC 26, 2012
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pour on tap at Falling Rockís Vertical Epic event, dark reddish brown pour with thin white head, aroma brought brown sugar, toffee, earth, vanilla, touch of oak, fig, and dark fruits, slight oxidation but really not all that bad. Taste is a nice mix of toasted brown sugars, bread, dark fruits, slight oxidation/cardboard, hints of vanilla, finishing fairly sweet, slightly dry. Held up pretty damn nicely.
cheap (4205) - Beaver Valley, Beaver County, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 23, 2012
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I write this review for all of the Stone Vertical Epics from 333 -999 but the numerical ratings of each are different. I pen this review reflecting on my tremendous respect for Horny Devil James Ė the supplier of these brews, Justin Lithy Ė the ratebeerian who supplied the locale, Ben london101 Ė for his VE comments and Beerman6686 Dan - for the interesting insights. Prior to this RB Pittsburgh December 2012 Post Apocalyptic Beer Tasting, I could have cared less for some happy BS vertical beers. However, James and Justin, by providing carefully guided beer experiences, which adjusted the stereo typical stigma that I held about such beers, and there numerical family. After I saw James immediately pour a bottle of 333 down the drain, after we all had a sample was not only breathtaking, but it I had to pinch myself to make sure it wasnít a dream. I was cautiously thinking to myself, without speaking out loud, about my cheapness, that I would have drank that whole bottle, if it was one of my singular tasking sessions. Perhaps I would have got sick, who knows. Well, for the ratings, they all were rather old, musty and tasted about the same, except the 777. The triple 3 was a dark, flat, old, rude, coors cardboard and bitter; fer sure. The 444 had a somewhat spicy smell and looked like pale lager. Of course, it come across rather old too. The 555 was a dark beer. It had some decent co2 for a change. Bitter initially, then mellowed. However, I found more it acceptable than most IPA. The devil #666 was just that. Dark pour with a decent head. Smell is a little tart, pretty good olfactory. Some co2 on the palate. Not as bad as the first 3 VEs. 777 was the best of the bunch, again a darker ale. Smell is acceptable. Really strong taste but did not have many of those negative old beer thing attributes. Lots of CO2 which makes this more fun Ė IMHO the best of the bunch fer sure. I thought it was because it was the newest, but modified my impression after having the 888 & 999. With the 888 pour is pale yellah. It must be a strong ale & the medicinal bitterness is quite high. Finish is back of throat bitter bite that goes on for quite a while. And lastly the 999. Seems much older in personality that the 444-888. Actually, I get the impressions of an old barley wine on the nose. Strong & rude. A little over the top fer sure. Does not hide alky what so ever. Not the best VE Iíve ever head, heheh. There Ė you have it; VE ratings from a VE newbee.
kramer (5095) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 22, 2012
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Bottle. Pours a slightly hazy dark amber body with a small fizzy off-white head. The nose is a ginormous load of oxidation, even more so than the 02. There is a weird almost menthol like note in here too, but itís buried below the oxidation. The flavor is pretty well totally destroyed, itís not even loaded with cardboard, itís just thin and watery with nothing positive to to say about it. An odd mix of alcohol and that weird menthol like note on the finish. Thin and watery with decent fizzy carbonation at least. The only thing positive to note about this beer is that the carbonation was still good. Worse than the 02 even, but itís a really tough competition.
DrSilverworm (6955) - Cincinnati, Ohio, USA - DEC 22, 2012
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Sample from a 22oz bottle. Hazy brown reddish color. Minimal off-white head - just a bit of swirly on the surface. Minimal lace. Fruity nose - apple, pear, some white grape. Hint of chocolate. Very smooth, almost no carbonation, but thatís OK, texture is great. This is impressive. I think age has worked for this.
nimbleprop (5201) - SouthWest, Washington, Washington DC, USA - DEC 22, 2012
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
On tap at Churchkey. I canít believe this lasted more than a week. Pours a transparent caramel amber with some creamy, off white head. Nose has a little cardboard, crackers, caramel, orange peel, a little leather. Flavor is sweet, orange, leather, malt, a little cherry, some apple juice. Medium bodied, still lightly sweet. Nice although a bit too far gone at this point.
nickd717 (3571) - San Francisco, California, USA - DEC 20, 2012
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
BACK INTO TICKING after a long hiatus - BOOM!!!! On tap at ChurchKey. Hazy dark chestnut brown with a one finger tan head. Oxidized but nice raisin and dark fruit aroma with prune and fit. Nice flavor despite some cardboard - medium sweetness with smooth roast, dark fruit, licorice, and malt balls. Medium-full body with a slick smooth palate and medium-low carbonation. Not that epic, but epic that I ticked it. BOOM!
Chudwick (2209) - Cincyucky, Kentucky, USA - DEC 19, 2012
3.6 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Draft to snifter - pours dark amber with offwhite head. Nose is just like the 06.06.06 I just had. Flavor is vinous. Honestly this is just like the 06.06.06 I just had.
AndyReynolds (917) - Dayton, Kentucky, USA - DEC 19, 2012
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
The aroma vs the taste on this beer is what has me at ends. The aroma is spicy with some caramel notes while the taste brings out a merlot quality, sweet with a grape type flavor, completely changing my expectation of the beer. Maybe that is contributed to the age. Mind blowing.
deekyn (1253) - San Francisco, California, USA - DEC 18, 2012
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
A - pours murky darker caramel orange brown. Little to no head. S - very grainy, barley, dark dried fruits, peppers, cinnamon, candied sugar, toffee, notes of tiramisu . M - medium bodied. Relatively simple palate. Sticky sweet no carb lingering lightly bitter grasses. T - sticky grainy up front, grains, dry dog food. Sticky caramel maltsand pepper on the palate. Lingering lightly bitter grassy malty end with notes of bread and over ripe bananas, scones, corriander. O - pretty good dubel 3.7
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone