GAManiac (1944) - Atlanta, Georgia, USA - APR 16, 2009
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
22oz bomber courtesy of sunnydlyte23 poured into a snifter.
Pours a deep, clear copper underneath a healthy tan head that lingers as a cap for the duration and leaves good lacing.
The aroma is sweet with lots of dark fruits - figs, raisins, pears - soaked in booze. Plenty of brown sugar and some licorice and spices. It actually has a slight hint of oxidation in the nose with a bit of stale cardboard coming through.
The taste has the same booze-soaked fruity sweetness as the aroma. There is plenty of dark malts forming a solid backbone along with Belgian sugars before the spices leave a slight tingle on the palate in the finish. Again, signs of oxidation in the taste, just as in the aroma.
The mouthfeel is medium bodied with decent carbonation and the oxidation seems to have thinned it out slightly. The alcohol is definitely present in the finish.
This is a good beer that I think was probably a great beer at some point - probably a little past itís prime. Very sweet with a good spice presence to mix it up a bit.
Thorpe429 (5006) - , Illinois, USA - JAN 13, 2013
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Served in a Stone Vertical Epic glass. Really malty and quite sweet. Quite similar to 03.03.03. A bit oxidized through the finish. Mostly just generically sweet.
HonkeyBra (3108) - Lemont, Illinois, USA - DEC 14, 2013
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
On draft. When this beer was released, the White Sox were in first place marching towards a World Series victory. I was still drinking bourbon, listening to Mike Jones, being 19 years old and generally embarrassing. Did this age well? No. But, you know me, I think beers that age well are the figment of the imagination of people who hoard beers. Pours a dark brown color with a beige head. Aroma of oxidation, cardboard, weird sweetness. Some clove and mild dark fruit. Flavor is flabby and generically sweet, lots of oxidation. Medium bodied, some average carbonation. Finishes weirdly sweet.
willblake (2632) - Bel Air, Maryland, USA - MAY 23, 2005
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
05.22.05 Sampled at jimmack04 invitational. Beer bottle brown pour with small beige head. Aroma of tomatoes and carrots. What the heck, I think, it canít be that. I wrap my hands around the snifter and practically drown my nose in the brew trying to find some other stand out aromas, but no, I keep getting a weird vegetal thing, weirdly out of place Belgian-like yeasts that really miss the mark for me, then a dose of clove, I donít know what to make of it before I even take a sip. The flavor is almost reminiscent of Chimay Red, but theres a wacky hop note (something c-hoppish) that bitch-slaps any hint of sweet Chimay Red goodness down to its knees. Melon mixed with citrus pith on finish choke out the best efforts of some sweet Belgian earthy, choco, raisin love that tries so damned hard to sneak its head in the door. But the Arrogant Bastard slams that door shut. Slams it shut.
YourDarkLord (1800) - Urbana, Illinois, USA - MAY 24, 2006
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Had planned on saving this and trying to get the entire series. As itís unlikely Iíll live to 12/12/12, may as well drink up. Besides, not all years have been banner ones, so what the hell. This is a clear dark brown with a frothy tan head. Citrus zest, caramel, hints of chocolate, and other, fairly typical Belgian vapors meet the nose. Medium body has lively carbonation. The flavor was fairly common Belgian strong ale along the lines of what one would get from Famtome and the like. Maybe by 12/12/12 it will be better. Damned if Iíll know.
t4h2c0 (89) - seattle, Washington, USA - JUL 22, 2008
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Man, maybe I aged my bottle poorly becasue it was not good in my opinion. After over two years of aging I was excitied to taste it after aging. What a disappointment. Poured dark redish brown with a thick white head. The poor balance of the beer threw my palate off right away, tasted like a funky belgian beer. I don’t understand why Stone is using a Belgian Yeast in beers that are supposed to age up to ten years. Well, i guess i’ll just have to let my next 05’ age even longer and see what happens.
brokensail (9918) - Orange County, California, USA - JAN 23, 2012
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
The beer pours a murky dark amber color without much of a head. There is a definite oxidation to the aroma. Lots of cardboard with the stale sugar and toffee notes. A bit of fruit, maybe some chocolate. The flavor is fairly boring, mostly due to the oxidation. Just sort of sweet and muddled with a bit of cardboard to it. Might be some dark fruit notes and yeast in there.
Mads Langtved (2245) - Copenhagen K, DENMARK - FEB 2, 2006
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottled: Slightly sticky texture. Somewhat a bit too thin and sweet. Hops and some yeast are present in the finish. An average strong ale.
Treebs (872) - , Illinois, USA - FEB 17, 2013
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
22 oz. bottle served in a CCB snifter.
A: Pours a dark plum color with some ruby highlights around the edges. An offwhite head forms on the pour and recedes to a thin ring. Some splotchy lace is left down the glass.
S: Grainy malt bills, some light rice cake with some wet paper. This one did not age all that well.
T: More of the same. A ton of cardboard, rice cake, and a little cocoa. Sweet cereal malts. The oxidation has really taken this one over.
M: Medium bodied with a medium carbonation level. Wet paper finish.
O: All the bottles had been stored the same so I donít know this was a product of a poorly sealed cap, or the beer wasnít strong enough from the onset to hold onto an semblance of the original flavor profile.
Serving type: bottle
kramer (4684) - Sunbury, Pennsylvania, USA - DEC 22, 2012
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Bottle. Pours a dark amber to brown body with a nice frothy beige head that retained as a thin ring. The nose is mostly oxidation, but thereís a little bit of a dark fruity note in there. Some light yeast and a hint of alcohol. The flavor is the best of the bunch so far, still a little too thin and oxidized to really warrant being called decent, but itís pretty drinkable. It has actually taken on some positive oxidation qualities. Finishes with some dark fruits, light roast, a little alcohol, some minimal yeastiness. Still not resembling the commercial description by any means, but this is passable as an íagedí beer. Mouthfeel is a bit heavier and fuller than the previous with really nice fizzy carbonation that adds to the drinkability. I would actually be able to finish a bottle of this (though happy that I didnít have to).