Mangino (1027) - Mississippi, USA - JUN 25, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours a dark brown color, small off white head. Aroma is strong banana, very strong fresh banana. Flavor is a banana chocolate split with some clove and other standard spices sitting atop. Thinking weizenbock more than dubbel.
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 18, 2006
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Bottle. Deep brown colour. Hoppy aroma, with some alcohol noticed. The aromas correspond to the palate, very hoppy, with alcohol showing. Doesn’t taste dark at all, even though it is a deep-ish brown colour. I don’t know how these gae and whether age will change it a lot, but it does feel a little raw.
Cornboy (424) - Eastampton, New Jersey, USA - OCT 15, 2006
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Dark brown pour with a tan head. Malty sweetness, hops, alcohol, fizzy and a little bit of spice. I think this one needs some time, was all over the place with no clear defined flavor. Alcohol comes through a bit strong for less than 9%. Will rerate this one after 6 months. Not impressed right now
mmmbeer (1225) - Austin, Texas, USA - DEC 6, 2012
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
(Note- I had the complete vert. excluding 12-12; however, 02 and 03 were purchased online as well as 04 and 05. The seller that sold me the 02 and 03 was later found to be recapping (tasted "fresh"), but 04 and 05 were definately aged to say the least. With the doubt encasing online purchases in general, I decided not to post the ratings regarding them. The rest were either bought outright (06 and 07 in Kentucky, 09 from Liquid Solutions, 10 from Oak Tree, 08 in a trade, 11 from a local purchase, and 12 HOPEFULLY on tap somewhere in town) so it’ll be ok with the rest.)
... and so it begins. 22 oz. bottler served in tumbler- poured a dark brown color with a tint of red. Thin white whisps upon the liquid surface for head, aroma of chocolate, fresh tannin, and some light yeast and spice. Hits the mouth with a thin body, malt is not distinguishable, some light sugar with prunes and spice in the middle, finish is somewhat dry with spices slightly lingering. Some age to it, but not a total waste.
pfhyde (55) - Davis, California, USA - JUL 27, 2006
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
For those with a predilection for imperial stouts, pleasure will ensue from this edition of the Vertical Epic line. For those like myself, however--those who find imperial stouts favorable only on certain occasions and moods--the response will vary. I find it rather typical of the imperial stout genre. Given its similarity to the likes of Old Rasputin and other microbrew styled imperial stouts, there’s not much that significantly differentiates it from other offerings. Of course there’s a perceptible difference, but to what end? Any difference is nominal, at best. To me, it seems like an inferior version of Old Rasputin, slightly watered down with excess toasted malts. The flavor is reminiscent of the scrapings from burnt toast; the only difference is that the alcohol goads one into consuming the entirety of the offering, despite the initial distaste.
Stine (1464) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - JAN 12, 2008
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Poured from a 22 oz. bottle. Sienna brown and ruby touched pour; murky. Doughy chocolate, honey and earthy maple in the nose. Reserved, and sophisticated. Damp red fruit, banana and cotton flavor with an aged quality of peat and cardboard; far from stunning and certainly in the retirement of old age. Weakly constructed in the mouth, without much body or strength remaining. Berries and husky, stale malt in a lingering and drying finish. In the coffin, but kicking out its last bit of character.
badbeer (434) - Iowa, USA - JUL 5, 2008
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Dark brown color with a light tan head atop of it, lacing was lacking. Smell was a bit light, bready, and even a bit smoky. Taste is smoky as well, was more like a rauchbier to me. I won’t detract just because it isn’t necessarily Belgian Styled, because Belgian style is hard to define as it is. I will however, detract from the fact that I just don’t like it. Medium bodied with high carbonation. I’m glad I shared the bottle and didn’t pick up two of them, won’t be buying this again.
omhper (19192) - Tyresö, SWEDEN - JUL 16, 2008
2.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottled at Petalax Beer Festival. Dark ruby with small head. Fruity, lightly yeasty nose with some coffee. Fruity and phenolic, slimmer than expected. A vast array of flavour is on offer, but aside from medicinal none demand much attention, so the flavour stay streamlined and without much depth. Perfectly correct, but as it does not offer something extra in either complexity, intensity nor drinkability it gets no real love from me. Just my acceptance.
beersearcher (2315) - Glendale, California, USA - FEB 9, 2010
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Sampled at Stone’s Winter Storm 2010. This has really mellowed. Pours dark brown. Not much bite or kick that I normally associate with Stone. Almost porter-ish. A little bit of hops at the end.
italarican (1470) - Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA - OCT 13, 2010
2.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Tap at the RnH Stone event. Dark chocolate pour with a liquidy, frothy khaki head. Aroma has an earthy hoppiness to go with roasted malt. Initial flavor is a surprising citrus bite of juicy orange with caramel, but then comes the markers of a beer that’s gone bad: I know those metal and vinegar notes were not intended. Surprsing level of citrus that unfortunately gets lost in a sea of liquid metal and vinegar. I can tell this was really good at some point, but she has passed her prime.