RateBeer
overall
94
99
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1703   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.54   EST. CALORIES: 132   ABV: 4.4%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
This deep amber ale has rich & roasty malt flavors, a big hoppy character, citrus overtones (courtesy of the hops and our special brewers yeast) and modest alcohol.


3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
herbjones (742) - Orange, California, USA - OCT 4, 2002
Dark copper pour with a thick tan head. Floral nose.No balance here. All hop bitterness with nothing to back it. Not one of Stones best.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
Brewmaster (168) - USA - NOV 17, 2002
Well, itís the worst of Stoneís offerings, but thats not a bad thing overall. A great drinkable beer indeed. If there was a Top 10 list of beers under 5% ABV this one would be on top for sure.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
Oakes (12789) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 4, 2003
Light cherrywood colour. Chocolate, caramel and citrus aroma. Bitter, woody, earthy - simple American amber.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 13/20
Blake (396) - Orange, California, USA - JUN 1, 2003
Had at Real Ale Festival on from cask - May 30, 2003
An amber colored beer, the head is mostly diminishing with an off-white head and a fair amount of lacing. I enjoyed this beer's interesting flavor - a mis of hops and sweetness, but I found the consistency too watery and not quite up to the Stone standards I've been used to. Drinkable, but I'll take the Double AB any day.

3.3
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
fly (1419) - austin, Tejas, Alabama, USA - JUN 15, 2003
Excellent hop aroma. Light and full at the same time (with the note that I believe this was Stone's attempt at making lighter fare, so it is MUCH different that the Arrogant style) Very enjoyable.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 14/20
TChrome (1425) - Bedford, Texas, USA - SEP 9, 2003
Not quite up to the very high stardards Stone has set for itself. This beer is I guess a lighter version of Stone Pale Ale, but it doesn't measure up. Some malt and hops in the nose. Beer is amber in color and has a good big head that is retained, and heavy lacing. Flavor was a bit of a let down for me. Stone is totally known for BIG flavor, and this beer doesn't get it done. Moderate hop assault, followed my a bit of malt sweetness. OK.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 12/20
FlacoAlto (3810) - Tucson, Arizona, USA - DEC 4, 2003
UPDATED: MAR 6, 2004 A strong malty aroma wafts from the glass as I pour, caramel malt perhaps. Pours with a thick tan head, it is pretty clear and a dark amber color. The aroma of hops is dominant in the aroma but a solid malt presence is there as well. Definitely a bitter beer. Some sweetness is here but not really perceptible as the hops dominate the residual sweetness. A certain fullness in the mouth from this "light" beer from stone. Not enough hop flavor is in this beer for me, it would help to balance this beer out. This beer is super hoppy, but it needs more flavor hop contributions (or perhaps different ones). Pretty well balanced for a super hoppy low gravity ale. The malt notes really help to carry this beer.

3.3
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
SDbruboy (1864) - San Diego, California, USA - JAN 20, 2004
Bottle, poured clear copper color with a thin white head. Light aroma, hoppy of course (it's a Stone brew after all) but also some honey and malt. Very flavorful for a "lighter" beer - nice malt backbone and lots of spicy, citrusy hops with a lingering bitter finish. Medium body and good carbonation.

3.3
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 1/5   TASTE 7/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 15/20
bierchik (95) - lakewood, California, USA - AUG 26, 2004
not a strong aroma some citrus hints, very hoppy IMO, it was too bitter for my likings. canít say much for the appreance, i drank it out of the bottle.

3.3
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 13/20
beerinmarch (2830) - Washington, USA - FEB 14, 2005
I think its that ambers are very subtle and uninteresting beers and not so much the fact that this wasnít that good. For an amber this was really nice, but i think it was still a bit of a let down. Aroma gives off tons of citrus hops, kinda getting your hops up. The flavor has a mild caramel malt presence up front finishing not nearly as hoppy as the aroma let on, but still very hoppy for an amber. Pours nice, darker copper, very clear, with a medium white head.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 132 133 134  135  136 137 138 » 171


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50