madmitch76 (12241) - , Essex, ENGLAND - JAN 6, 2013
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
24th May 2011
Hazy amber beer, ghost of a white head. Slightly syrupy palate. Rich malt. Sourish seltzer minerals that impart some bitterness. Dried fruit and aniseed. Warming finish. Pretty drinkable but I prefer my Old Guardian straight.
michaelinwa (536) - Bothell, Washington, USA - JAN 1, 2013
2.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
2011 bottle. Light golden pour, malt aroma, decent head. Taste is intense sweet ripe fruit and malt, with a massive hop presence. Even after nearly 2 years in the cellar, itís over the top and overly aggressive with malt and bitterness.
GarrettB (850) - La Jolla, California, USA - NOV 22, 2012
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
July 13th, 2011 - Stoneís philosophy seems to be "Brew whatever the hell you want", and I respect that. They donít feel obliged to put a wheat beer and an amber on the menu just because the brewing crowd does. Their panoply of beers crowd into a hoppy, sweet section of the brewing spectrum, and this does cause for some personal confusion. Itís never very easy for me to define or delineate Stone brews from each other. They all have a strong, bold flavor profile, and plenty of hops. This problem appeared again with my sampling of the Old Guardian Belgo. Barleywines I know - I know them well. But the introduction of a Belgian yeast strain confounded my poor palate. Was I in Escondido, or Brussels? Or both? It glows with Stoneís signature red amber body, and lurks beneath a thin white head. Sweet cherries and cough medicine form the nose, with lots of caramel and toffee, sweet and sticky. And of course, thereís a strong edge of hops in the aroma, but where would a Stone beer be without that? Probably without the Stone brand on its label. The taste isnít as strong as the smell, but itís got that wind-up alcohol punch that leaves brewery tourists stumbling out the front doors after only a few small samples. Bubble gum and cotton candy emerge in the mid-taste, but are kept under tight lid by both the hops and the booze. Finally, in the aftertaste is a warming bitterness with caramel, and a featuring of the caramel richness from the barley wine style parameters. This is a good beer, and while itís fine for summer, I see this being more appropriate as a winter brew.
dalekliz (810) - San Diego, California, USA - NOV 8, 2012
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
2011 bottle. Pours a dark amber-brown with a big foamy off-white head. Rich sharp aroma, of yeast, dark fruits, preserved citrus, sugar, malt, hops. Taste is sharp and sweet, of malt, yeast, preserved oranges, citrus hops, caramel. Lingering rich hops and caramel. Very tasty.
Reynolds314 (1887) - Connecticut, USA - NOV 4, 2012
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
This beer was a dissapointment. Pours caramel colored with little head. Aroma is even cloying here just tons of sweetness. Taste is more of the same with overwhelming sweetness and booze. Doesnt have much subtlty to it at all.
SaintMatty (4296) - Uppsala, SWEDEN - NOV 3, 2012
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
650ml Bottle - Copper with a small head. Leather, spicy fruitcake and malt feature in the rather boozy aroma. Warming, rich and fruity taste with notes of raisins, sultanas, spicy malt, pine and toffee detected. Rich and indulgent. Definitely one to sip.
jredmond (4620) - Manhattan, New York, USA - OCT 31, 2012
3.7 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Draft at pony HK courtesy of streets, Annie, and Brendan. Pours an amber body with white lacing. Aroma is maple syrup, light booze and vanilla. Mouthfeel is slick with notes of maple, molasses, vanilla, oak, sweet malt and booze.
Ernesto987 (3041) - Connecticut, USA - OCT 26, 2012
3.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
meh, this might be past itís prime, not a fan and I hate barleywines already so 3.2 is generous
buttslamify (52) - - OCT 13, 2012
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
This is my big problem with stone. Bitterness and hoppiness it great, but when your slamming it into a barley wine, it destroys it. This was not enjoyable, it was well made (thus the 3.3), but not enjoyable at all. Donít get me wrong, stone is an amazing brewery, one of the best, but outside of their ales (IPA, strong american, etc) Iíve been underwhelmed.
TimE (2810) - Tokyo, JAPAN - OCT 8, 2012
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
fairly yeasty, aromatic, alcohol well hidden, smooth, heavy buy not cloying. A touch of brown sugar. Fairly hoppy.