RateBeer
overall
96
98
style

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 1653   WEIGHTED AVG: 3.61   EST. CALORIES: 162   ABV: 5.4%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Deep amber in color, Stone Pale Ale is robust and full flavored. A delicate hop aroma is complemented by a rich maltiness.


2.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 14/20
bindpmc (88) - San Diego, California, USA - MAY 29, 2006
Iíve always thought of APAs as the Ale equivalent to amber lagers: just middle-of-the-road, non-inventive, stylistically inflexible beers. If youíve had one APA, youíve had them all. The orange-y start, the generic hops tone, the entirely indistinguishable malt finish. Just about the most neutral, safe pale ale one can seek. This one delivers in all categories. Fully undistinctive, pleasant but not memorable, and leaving not a single quality in the afterglow worth mentioning. Not a bad beer by any account. Instead, this is just a decent beer, and the thought of wasting any time describing the nose (none worthy of mention), the lacing (none), the downtake (same as any other of this kind), the aftertaste (same again)...you get the idea. Ballastís Yellowtail is about as popular on tap around here as this, and that one is a mystery to me. Maybe the guys at Stone should step up to the plate and make this one a little more distinctive and a little less generic. The local brewers around here hang their collective hats on their IPAs, as they should, since each SD brewer brings a personal touch to the IPAs they offer. This...this is just Stone Pale Ale, and I can walk around the corner right now and see a homeless dude drinking it outside the corner store. Seriously. Once again, a good beer. Once again, no better than any of the other starter "good beers", like Fat Tire or Yuengling Lager, or any other world of other middling slighty hoppy ales.

2.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
alexanderj (3320) - Branson, Missouri, USA - DEC 30, 2006
Had a sample after the tour at Stone; didnít like it and something seemed off. So I had it again on draft, same reaction. Not much hops, some malt. Very disappointing. Used to better quality from Stone.

2.9
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 5/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 11/20
cathcacr (636) - Oregon, USA - JAN 27, 2007
This one deserves a good swift kick in the ass for its lack of Arrogance and oomph. The first Stone product that I wasnít much impressed by. Back to recruit training with this one! Címon, let me see your REAL beer face!

2.9
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
sstackho (249) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUN 9, 2007
12oz bottle. Decided to pick this one up instead of trying the Stone IPA since I needed to have some "calmer" beers for visitors. Pours a clear copper with medium head and carbonation. Aroma is a bit light and indistinct. And I have to say that the taste is also indistinct. Itís difficult to put in words, since thereís nothing that particularly stands out with this one. Iím a bit surprised at its relatively high ratings... (well, high overall, but a bit low for Stone.) Perhaps Stoneís reputation is responsible for this? I have to say Iím disappointed with this one - and thatís the first time Iíve ever had to say that about a Stone product. I wasnít expecting anything over the top from their APA, but was hoping for more than this.

2.9
   AROMA 7/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 11/20
muzzlehatch (4424) - Burlington, Vermont, USA - JUL 2, 2007
Sample from 12 ounce bottle at the Mondial, Montreal (May 2007). Kind of surprising that Iíve never tried this before, but oh well....pours a nice dark amber-copper color, lightly hazy, with a smallish lasting head but no lacing to speak of ....slightly funky, floral, strongly hoppy aroma, touched by dogwood and overripe apricots, nice....unfortunately the pleasantries donít carry through all that well to the palate; itís watery, very light in character, dry and woody towards the finish and altogether pretty boring....Iím rather surprised; canít say Iím a huge Stone partisan, but I usually think theyíre decent; this is just dull as all getout.

2.9
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 11/20
posikyle (165) - Alabama, USA - AUG 11, 2007
Not my favorite stone, I was pretty disappointed. Too much of a fruity aftertaste for me, over seemed a little flat tasting.

2.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 4/5   OVERALL 10/20
lunaticharness (183) - Torrance, California, USA - JUL 20, 2003
nice beautiful fat thick head on a light amber colored body, kind of a soapy flavor, crisp, kind of wimpy... not as good as the rest of the brews...

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Kinz (3307) - Glen Allen, Virginia, USA - FEB 13, 2005
They never send this out East it seems, even though it is their "flagship" beer. So I drug a bottle back from California with me. Now I can see why they donít bother sending it East. It just isnít all that good. I went out of my way when rating this not to compare it to the rest of the unbelievable Stone line up, but this beer really just did nothing for me. Nice appearance though, deep copper with ruby, good head. Vaguely caramel aroma with bitter hops. In the mouth, the medium body is caramel, with a muddled, bitter hop finish. No particular hop flavors jumped out, just a basic astringency that didnít even combine well with the caramel malt. Not so much.

2.8
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
ajm (1066) - Los Angeles, California, USA - NOV 11, 2007
Unless youíre stuck at a Yard House in East Nowhere, I donít know why this would be your call (if youíre the type who pores over ratebeer ratings). Itís more of a starter beer - the one that gets your buddy to start drinking micro. Very clean, not hopped like an IPA. A good palette cleanser.

2.8
   AROMA 6/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
Cobra (1100) - Banned City, - JAN 17, 2008
Overall, a decent pale ale. A bit too hoppy for the gravity, but still a decent beer. Plenty of hops, plenty of malty flavors. Decent mouthfeel, but a little over hopped for my tastes.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 158 159 160  161  162 163 164 » 166


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2014,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50