Padron4KM (618) - Chandler, Arizona, USA - JUL 26, 2003
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Nice looking dark beer.
Coffee, chocolate aroma.
medium body, bitter/sweet flavor.
not one of Stones best, but still pretty darn good
roomtempbeer (185) - Franklin, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 26, 2003
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Beer pours (in Chimay glass) a deep black liquid light can nearly penetrate with a fine copper-caramel color that disapates quickly to nothing. Aroma is of molasses, toffee with sweetness. Flavor is a medium to small hop - otherwise nothing. Beer looks great - taste leaves something to be desired. Decent beer - could be better. Maybe this will be my gateway beer to hoppier beers. Don't dream far, though. Sampled at 71 degrees Fahrenheit.
mrkimchee (1414) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 21, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: AUG 10, 2003 funnily enough I find this smokier than I remember the 6th anniversary version. it's better balanced too, with some good chocolate and smooth, sweet malt flavours. roasty, smoky finish.
redlem (1306) - Ohio, USA - JUL 21, 2003
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Dark ruby color with a medium creamy tan head. A bitter(going against what the bottle says, but this is jsut for the aroma) roasted malts with a slight pacific coast hop aroma. Upon warming the hops become more dominate in the aroma and taste. Finish is slightly dry.
wunderbier (1434) - Tampere, FINLAND - JUL 21, 2003
3.9 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
UPDATED: JUN 7, 2006 Hahahokay. So I was figuring I might have to bump this up a little before I looked at my old rating and saw it was a 3.3. Nonono, so much tastier than that. I don’t really smell any fruitiness to this beer any more, don’t know if that was due to the original batch I had or me being stupid. Lots of chocolate/coffee/roast/smoke as mentioned previously. Hops are slightly present in the nose this time but undetectable in the flavor with roasty bitterness being completely dominant. No chalkiness either. I should probably go rerate some other early-acquired porters as well...
22 oz bottle, pint glass. Average sized, tan head diminishes quickly. Black body is cola-like in appearance. Malt smells of roasted, bitter chocolate, light coffee. Hops are very light. Flavor contains hints of dark chocolate and dark bitter fruits...all smoked of course. Smoke adds a roastiness to this beer which is complimentary, not dominant. Body is lighter than I thought it would be but is still medium and creamy. Hops add a definite bitter zing to the finish. Slight chalkiness in the finish.
beermatrix (1497) - Twin Cities, Minnesota, USA - JUL 9, 2003
4.8 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 19/20
Pours a syrupy brown only to settle in the glass as super dark brown, nearly black, excellent lookin' porter. Firm thick, inch tall tannish cocoa colored head that fades slowly leaving hazy thin placed sheets of crispy looking lace all over the glass. Absolutely gorgeous!
Aroma is nice steady sweet chocolate/cocoa, very smooth, rich, and a great smokey richness of roasted deep chocolate and black malts. Even a slight coffeeness noted. Yum!
Taste is quite exceptional, excellently done of smooth sweet chocolate up front, tones of roastyness settle in quickly of smoked black malts. Rich, luscious, and a super interior hop bitterness of mild abode that picks up in the finish with some more roasty smokeyness and hoppy, earthed bitterness and slight dryness of coffee and twinged chocolate late. Good full feel, solid creamyness all through and an excellent lingering finish of slight smoke, what a shock; not.
The drinkability on this is amazing - smooth, rich, creamy, and easy. Thank goodness it comes in the 22oz bomber to help keep the glass full longer, at least for a little while anyway.
Aurelius (4561) - Tallahassee, Florida, USA - JUL 9, 2003
4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
On tap, Ginger Man, NYC. Char aroma with berry or raisin and cocoa. Deep ruby black-brown. Damn smooth. Creosote, plum smokey in the back palate. A perfect blend with the toasted turkey and brie sub. Sturdy enough, but not too chewy for session.
drewcifer85710 (158) - Youngstown, Ohio, USA - JUL 5, 2003
4.2 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 18/20
Deep dark brown/red with little to no head to speak of. Smells of smoke and chocolate. Ultra smooth really, a medium-heavy body and a bit of a creamy mouthfeel. chocolate and coffee in the flavor, and finishes off smokey. Pretty nice.
jgb9348 (4968) - Arlington (Pentagon City), Virginia, USA - JUL 3, 2003
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Dark brown in colour, almost completely opaque, but when stretched at the sides...some lighter brown shows through. A nice large-bubbled brown head tops the beer, with adequate lacing on the sides. The smell is typically that of a normal Porter, a small amount of smoke and tobacco, but pretty subtle. The mouthful is nice, not too thin, not too thick and the carbonation is not overwhelming. The flavour is pretty good, definately smokey and some chocolate and roasted malt tones are picked up. A pretty good beer, but thats really what you come to expect from Stone. I've been looking forward to trying this, and I wasn't disapointed.
Kinz (3414) - Glen Allen, Virginia, USA - JUL 2, 2003
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
A nifty beer. Although light doesn't seem to penetrate much, it doesn't have the molasses-like clinging consistency of similarly dark beers. The head, beige in nature slowly but surely faded to virtual nothingness. The aroma was fascinating, spruce, chocolate, and a bit of smoke and Ajax powder. The flavor initially smacked of spruce, with a touch of a gum flavor from my childhood called pepsin. As it warmed, the spruce faded, the bitter chocolate came forward a bit, and the smoke served a nice complimentary, but not at all dominating role. Interesting, and remarkably refreshing in nature. Perhaps not the first beer I would always reach for, but very, very well made. Hats off to Greg Koch et al.