gameface23 (131) - Haverhill, Massachusetts, USA - JUL 19, 2008
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
UPDATED: AUG 10, 2008 Bottle that was a few monthís past itís enjoy by date. It poured black with a tan head that was gone within 2 minutes. It smelled like someone lit a campfire in the distance. I could really taste the smokiness.
akinm (282) - San Diego, California, USA - AUG 17, 2002
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
The one Stone beer I do not like. When they say smoked porter they mean SMOKED. It is too smoky for my tastes. It is a great beer to look at and it can blend well with other beers such as the stone pale but by itself it is very smoky.
beerheart (237) - Erie, Colorado, USA - NOV 29, 2005
2.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Amber color. Medium thickness. Nice coffee-colored head. Thin lace. Alcohol smell. Fruity tasting. Raising. Alcohol on the back end. Overall disappointing compared to other porters (Fullerís London and Samuel Smithís Taddy, for example) that rate as highly on RateBeer.
DaDornta (3) - USA - AUG 25, 2006 does not count
2.7 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
This is only the second smoked porter, or beer for that matter that I have tried. This smoked porter *PALES* in comparison to the Alaskan Brewing Co. smoked porter. The "smokiness" is hardly present at all. The color, head, aroma and taste are "decent". Iím certainly glad it was half the price of the Alaska Brewing Co.ís smoked porter...It certainly tastes like half the beer the AK brewing does.
crajun (803) - , Texas, USA - FEB 16, 2009
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Didnít smell nor tast much if any smoke.
Not bad, but not flavorful or special
oobawa (626) - South Carolina, USA - MAY 7, 2011
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 8/20
You gotta be careful with smoked malts-- itís very easy to overload them into a brew and end up with beer that tastes like itís being served in an ashtray. Stone Smoked Porter eases back the throttle on the burnt roastiness, presenting a good porter that just so happens to also give off a bongwater finish. Look, Iím trying to be objective, but smoked beers have yet to rub my rhubarb the right way. Stoneís Smoked Porter serves as the best example of the style Iíve come across, but I still donít like it very much. The smokiness only grows as the beer warms, and eventually the beer turns my burps into charcoal briquettes. (2008)
JakeWrobel (16) - - AUG 18, 2012
2.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Had high expectations for this beer after the aroma had my mouth watering. However, I was thoroughly surprised that the aroma did not transfer to the taste. Too much vanilla for my liking. Had an off taste for some reason. It just didnít tste like a Porter.
Kevbo99 (149) - Dunmore, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 5, 2002
2.6 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Did not live up to the expectations. thought the lack of chocolate and roasted malt replaced by the taste of smoked malt sucked. nothing worth trying ever again. Go for a taddy porter/ much much better.
footbalm (1219) - Western Minneapolis Suburbs, Minnesota, USA - MAY 30, 2005
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
I have to say that after having an Alaskan Smoked Porter a few weeks ago I am totally let down with this.There was no comparison.This was slighly fragrant of roasted malts but no smokiness at all and the flavor was more like weak porter.
SB (333) - Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 19, 2005
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Aroma was smokey. Flavor was slightly hinted chocolate, and smokey burnt flavor. It had a good mouth feel, but for some reason I just didnít care for it. i ended up giving mine to a friend, who in turn gave it to another friend. I think the smokeyness was too overpowering.