Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - MAR 14, 2002
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
very light malt flavor, very little hops. beautiful clear golden color. went well with pizza. An average drinkable brew. To buy this or a macro? well, this of course! gotta support the little guys!
Drinkingdan (375) - East Norriton, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 1, 2002
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
I don’t find anything special about it.
ravidesai (947) - Bombay, INDIA - JAN 31, 2002
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
fairly standard yellow colored lager. not exceptionally good but a steo up from the macro breweries.
rather watery and bland but it does have some malt in it.
from one of Pennsylvania’s regional breweries so this is usually quite fresh.
Norton (329) - Southside, Richmond, Virginia, USA - DEC 19, 2001
2.5 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
HEY! Not bad at all! Had this when in school in PA quite often. Delightfully light yet hoppy and crisp. There are far worse beers around than this.
21iceman40 (1732) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - NOV 30, 2001
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
More beer in a bag. Tastes bad, but has a good all american name to it. The bag is ingenious though.
FUNK (120) - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 19, 2001
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
This stuff had only a very vague skunk smell and tasted like waterdowned crap. Its one redeaming quality is that it comes in a platic bag with a draw string. The idea being you put ice in the bag with the beer to keep it cold. I have to respect that idea.
Andrew196 (1095) - Katy, Texas, USA - NOV 14, 2001
3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not BAD. There are definitely better lagers than this, but I would actually pay to drink this beer. I knew a guy from St. Mary’s PA who swore by this stuff, but decide for yourself.
dolemike1 (1288) - Jeannette, Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 18, 2001
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 3/20
Watery crap. It might be fresh but it still sucks. Only a small step up from Bud.
fishman (350) - Philadelphia, USA - JUN 26, 2001
3.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Honestly fresh, particularly when you get it directly from the brewery. This is a great beer when fresh, I can’t say how it is after some shelf time though.
Delbomber (387) - Philadelphia, USA - JUN 25, 2001
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
This is a smooth, flavorful beer. I’ve been told wheat is a component, so don’t drink too much or you’ll be sorry the next day. Leaves a bit of a faint, funny aftertaste though, similar to the smell of wet hay (not as bad as it sounds). A Pennsylvania favorite. My friend gets it fresh from the brewery, so it may not be as good elsewhere.