 motelpogo (4391), Plzen, Czech Republic
Oct 21, 2003
one of those sort of ridiculous beers that tell you the brewers don't have a clue. tasted like a premium lager. why they put wheat in there is a mystery. flavourless. not offensive just dull
yalnikim (720), Wellington, New Zealand
Oct 8, 2006 Tasted 02/10/2006. Straw gold, bright, with the lovely gentle carbonation that all of this breweries beers have. Tight white head lingers. Nose is very wheaty, a hint sulphurous, with some woody spice. Lolly notes show through as it warms. Tart, dry and watery in the mouth. More sulphur, which really lets the side down. Very short. Light bodied, with a lively yet gentle carbonation.
mullet (795), Melbourne, Australia
May 2, 2004 Yeasty, jalapeno aroma that most of this brewery’s beers seem to have. Very light, dry flavour with a lingering bitterness and a weird numbing sensation. Fairly wheaty flavour too. Very pale and clear, poor head retention. Pretty ordinary.
Betty (234), Walgett, NSW, Australia
Nov 26, 2003 Horrible stuff based on cane sugar no matter what the description say. Put a lemon in there for sure so it taste like something. Some infection.
duff (5469), East London, Greater London, England
Sep 29, 2003 Pale, pale gold, absolutley no flavour. As i sat their and drank it, i wondered why the hell i even bothered. Aussie Corona is probably right, less of a pee flavour though. Fizzy finish.
beerledgend (900), Meadowbank Auckland, New Zealand
Sep 27, 2003 Very pale yellow, big spritzy head, mild what aroma littele flavour.(aussie Corona)
|
