av8rneil (2) - killeen, Texas, USA - MAY 24, 2008 does not count
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
Despite what others may think. My wife and I enjoy this beer very much, whether at an Indian restaurant or at home.
MarkSachon (553) - Pennsylvania, USA - SEP 1, 2013
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Big bottle at Taj Mahal restaurant on McKnight road in Pittsburgh. Pours a transparent pale gold with a minimal frothing on top. A bit light on flavor but perfectly matched for Indian cuisine. Price on thebottle was around $9.00
ronaldtheriot (1183) - Laplace, Louisiana, USA - MAY 5, 2013
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Taj Mahal has a thick, white head and a clear, bubbly, straw appearance, with some lacing left behind. The aroma is of sweet, bready, barley malt, and the taste is the same, with a predominate paperyness and some subdued hop bitterness to round it out. Mouthfeel is light and watery, and Taj Mahal finishes crisp, clean, and refreshing. Yes, this is really nice, and I score it as such. RJT
HopTsing (403) - Sandston, Virginia, USA - MAY 11, 2012
3.8 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 15/20
From the bottle poured a lovely,clear, yellow brew with a generous white head. Faint aromas and flavors of malt and hops. Light bodied and tasty. I liked it a lot.Best served IMO COLD!.
JonnyLager (8) - Indiana, USA - DEC 17, 2009 does not count
3.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Very true to the premium lager category. Smooth, malty corn flavors that finish well. Slight metallic notes that are not overwhelming. In general a good drinkable lager.
brewhaha1 (13) - Arlington, Virginia, USA - JUL 7, 2012
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 16/20
first Indian beer I ever had. got it at Haandi in Fairfax. overall not a bad or a good beer.
seuinoz (142) - Chicago, Illinois, USA - AUG 15, 2003
3.5 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
very mushy taste.
not good(but not great.)
it's just an ok beer
claimed to be good with fish and seafood, nope not good at all with those dishes.
tried it once not again.
johndoughty (3859) - cheslyn hay, West Midlands, ENGLAND - DEC 21, 2011
3.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
Bottle. Golden and clear with a medium head.Sweet with some maltiness and left no lacing. Pleasant but a bit boring.
RSRIZZO (1850) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - AUG 2, 2009
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
650 ML. bottle. Color is a pale yellow gold with very good carbonation and a very nice thick head. Aroma is skunky at first but this seems to fade letting a sweet grain scent come out. Taste is smooth and light. Starting with a light body it goes down smooth with a creamy feel. Finish is a mild sweet taste of malt with just a faint bitterness on the end. After taste is clean and short lived. This is a very good brew for a basic Pale Lager, its very easy to drink with a clean refreshing after taste.
ARMed (597) - Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 26, 2011
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
A typical mass produced premium lager but one with some decent flavor. Poor lacing and body but a nice finish and palate. Perfect when eating either spicy Indian or Japense food.