RSRIZZO (1873) - Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA - AUG 2, 2009
3.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
650 ML. bottle. Color is a pale yellow gold with very good carbonation and a very nice thick head. Aroma is skunky at first but this seems to fade letting a sweet grain scent come out. Taste is smooth and light. Starting with a light body it goes down smooth with a creamy feel. Finish is a mild sweet taste of malt with just a faint bitterness on the end. After taste is clean and short lived. This is a very good brew for a basic Pale Lager, its very easy to drink with a clean refreshing after taste.
ARMed (613) - Garnet Valley, Pennsylvania, USA - OCT 26, 2011
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
A typical mass produced premium lager but one with some decent flavor. Poor lacing and body but a nice finish and palate. Perfect when eating either spicy Indian or Japense food.
Nekronos (3738) - Xalapa, MEXICO - JAN 4, 2013
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 15/20
Not much to say it was special, quite sweet and nice foam but not far from that. NIce golden features too.
DrDurling (1) - Hanwell, New Brunswick, CANADA - OCT 12, 2013 does not count
3.3 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Nice lager, easy drinkability with delicious Indian cuisine. Crisp taste, minimal head.
---Rated via Beer Buddy for iPhone
Gription79 (2409) - Bountiful, Utah, USA - OCT 9, 2011
3.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
650 ml bottle
A: pilsner malt, apple, slight berry
T: same as aroma, however the malt is well defined for a macro beer
I have nothing against this beer, one of the best macro lagers made. It is dry, malty, and easy drinking.
sailracer (422) - Massachusetts, USA - OCT 14, 2011
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Bottle. Pours a golden yellow with a thin head that dissipates pretty quickly. This was your typical pale lager, though with a little lighter carbonation. Decent flavor but not very complex.
mrmartin (734) - New York, New York, USA - AUG 26, 2014
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Clear golden pour with minimal head . Sweet and sticky. Lots of carbonation. Easy to session. Lots of corn. Probably tastes real good when fresh.
Pretty much a standard lager
MrRoss (646) - Delta, British Columbia, CANADA - AUG 10, 2009
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Your basic swill, with a not-too uriny colour and aroma, and a decent head. Taste was again a basic swill, but better than Kingfisher. I wouldn’t bother with this again.
TheBeerOrg (2145) - Louisville, Kentucky, USA - JUL 24, 2010
3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pours light golden with a fully receding white head. Notes of pils malt, bitter herbs, light sweetness. Thin bodied with lively carbonation.
tbopslt (351) - New York, USA - MAR 14, 2013
3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 12/20
Poured from bottle. Minimal head and carbonation. Pale yellow. Hoppy aroma. Crisp tasting lager. Not as bad as I had thought. Certainly drinkable.