CQC (224) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - MAY 17, 2002
2.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
High speed drink.. get it down ya throat an then get onto sommit else. Watery, bland, with the viscosity of hot water. Not the worst, but nowhere near the best. But then, it is just Lager. (Sorry all you Aussies out there, I should explain: - Lager is a particular type of Beer, or in Australia it is the only type of Beer. OK?)
Andrew196 (1091) - Katy, Texas, USA - MAY 15, 2002
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Nothing special here. Just a bland skunky lager.
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 6, 2002
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 13/20
whatever, i can handle it as a regular mainstream lager. not too terrible as some have said earlier
Drew (2411) - Kent, Ohio, USA - APR 30, 2002
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 6/20
very light. very little taste. some metallic tastes. not impressive at all.
Cheesemonster99 (14) - Glasgow, - APR 20, 2002
0.5 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Absolutely disgusting! If you’ve ever wondered what battery acid tastes like then try this!
prpplague (247) - Euless, Texas, USA - APR 17, 2002
2.4 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
a sickly sweet aroma that fades quikly after the bottle is opened. the rest of the beer is very similiar to american brews such as budweiser, but maybe with a little care in the brewing processes.
TheBeerCollector (633) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - APR 12, 2002
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 10/20
Let me preface my comments by stating that I drank a pint of this immediately following a pint of Newcaste Brown Ale. This tastes like watered down Budweiser. Don’t pay the extra $$$ when Bud is so much cheaper and tastes better.
fatherpierre (62) - Leeds, ENGLAND - APR 7, 2002
0.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 1/20
Along with Carling this drink is amongst the worst I have tasted. A metallic lager with a definite chemical aftertaste. And I live in Scotland. This beer is regarded here as ’the poor mans drink’ or ’the alcoholics drink’ due to its low price and, frankly, awful taste. Nasty. And it’s rapidly losing pump space to Stella and Kronengbourg 1664-thank God. McAwan’s went the same way 5 yrs ago. Scotish lager is CRAP.
thebaron99 (110) - Royston Park SA, AUSTRALIA - APR 5, 2002
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Rerate#3. Sweet honeyish delight. Slightly grassy, and pumpernickel bread tones with strong leather dubbin in the finish. Too smooth for a garage beer, but enough funk to pass flavour test. Fast becoming fave lager too quickly. Brillo!
Beloved Beer (278) - California, USA - APR 3, 2002
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: FEB 22, 2003 Re-Rate: got real icky real fast. ok enough when real cold but just drink fast.