Sully (1377) - Potts Point, New South Wales, AUSTRALIA - NOV 4, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Gaaaaaak. When ever you see the words 'malt liquor', run. Thick and sweet, but very vegetative, something like the state you would be in if this was your beer of choice. what
duff (5484) - Copenhagen, DENMARK - NOV 2, 2003
0.7 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Looks OK i s'pose, decent creamy head with a fair bit of lace happening. Colour was a very dull gold, quite pale. Supersweet, with heaps of alcohol showing, stewed fruit, boiled veggies, and just too much alcohol and metal in there. Quite sticky aswell, and a thin, harsh mouthfeel.
motelpogo (6111) - Plzen, CZECH REPUBLIC - OCT 17, 2003
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
i'd been avoiding this beer for quite some time but some time but desperation to try a new beer got the better of me. no worse than i expected, harsh metalic metho flavours and pretty nasty afterburn
eczematic (1306) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - OCT 7, 2003
0.9 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
tastes of stewed apples, metho, and puke. currently have nasty headache which i blame entirely on half a can of this delicious nectar. so much suffering has gone into that crown beside my name...
bluevegie (3041) - Perth, AUSTRALIA - SEP 18, 2003
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
This is one of the lowest ratings I have given. It has got bugger all flavour and not much aroma the only thing it has got going for it is it's alcohol strength.
andy609 (143) - Auburndale, Massachusetts, USA - AUG 24, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I am surprised that this beer is rated so low. As I sampled it, I would call it an imperial pilsner. I am surprised it is not listed as a European Strong Lager because I found it to be very similar to the Czech Republic's Extra Boom. Aroma of cheap malts. Golden body with a decent head. Hoppy upfront with a big malt finish that mostly covers up the alcohol. I found this to be an enjoyable brew.
rauchbier (3552) - Isle Of Beer, Lincolnshire, ENGLAND - JUL 25, 2003
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Can. Golden colour, poor head and low condition. Low sweet malt and hop aroma, fairly smooth and clean in the mouth with a hint of alcohol and a bitterness into the finish. Not as foul as I feared.
Nagash (207) - Paris, FRANCE - MAY 17, 2003
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Not so bad for a strong lager, i'm used to worst :) Quite sweet witout a too agressive alcohol taste.
CEZ (396) - Milano, ITALY - MAY 12, 2003
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
[draught] I used to remember it was just too sweet for me, but the other night I decided to give it another try... and, well, I almost liked it. I admit it was a hot and sultry night, and a drink (any drink!) was definitely appreciated, but fact is that it was sweet but not cloying; the alcohol was strong but not overpowering. Smooth mouthfeel.
Spiesy (2338) - Sydney, Greater London, AUSTRALIA - MAY 7, 2003
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Can. From the first sip you knew this was tramp-juice you were drinking, to be very truthful with you it looked all right. Again this is a beer for the purist drank. I'm just a budding alcoholic so I'm going to steer well clear of this in future.