DougiePhiTau (99) - USA - APR 9, 2005
3.3 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Ok his stuff is great it is so easy to drink i know it i not very complex thick or ull of flavor or evn a beer by most standards but it is fun
21iceman40 (1732) - Grafton, Wisconsin, USA - AUG 31, 2001
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
I really liked tequiza, but this stuff was very bad. Smelled bad, looked bad and tasted bad.
K-V-F-L (292) - LaVista, Nebraska, USA - OCT 23, 2001
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
A stronger Tequiza merely omits the sweetness and injects an un-beer-like bitterness. OK when right out of the bottle; the smell is of stale bananas. The high rating is due to the fact that the texture is stronger than the regular version.
Cornboy (424) - Eastampton, New Jersey, USA - OCT 26, 2005
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
No date on this rating, had to be 3 years ago. I admit I like tequiza regular on a nice summer day, so easy to drink. This one just wasnt for me. The flavors mesh pretty well with the artificial sweetness in the original, this one they are not balanced. Guess thats why this one faded...
Bov (9815) - Bienne, SWITZERLAND - OCT 2, 2000
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
light orange colour, sweet, tequila aroma, far too much carbonation - not good
AG420 (16) - USA - JUN 20, 2006
2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
Easy to drink, not the best but its different. Good for a thurst buster during a hot summer day.
budguy2142 (24) - USA - JAN 28, 2002
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 3/20
Worst idea since Tequiza. If I wanted Tequila, I would drink it.
Slick (1969) - Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA - APR 17, 2004
1.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I'm sitting here thinking what did they actually give me that is extra from the original.Hmmm,nothing.The color is straw with a sweet aroma of mild malt and something that i just can't describe.The flavor was just as bad as the regular with maybe a little bit more flavor but not much.It's just not good and i can see how this might be popular in a yuppie bar or a just turned 21 place but it has no real place in the beer world for folks that actually have a pallate for brew.Blah,Try it once but i recommend not going beyond that.
rman18 (311) - Caldwell, New Jersey, USA - APR 30, 2008
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
I think its worse then the original... but it does have more alcohol in it which is a plus. More alcohol = get drunk faster = drink less of this crappy artificial lime flavored corona but worse beer.
Puss Gutt99 (206) - Oldtown, Florida, USA - JAN 26, 2002
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
giant steps back from the original Tequiza