 HoppedHead (106), seattle, Washington, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Apr 13, 2002 disgusting!!!!!!
beerstop (173), Roanoke, Virginia, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 |
Apr 11, 2002 Updated: Feb 5, 2003horrible. tequilla flavors do not belong in a beer.
grymy (105), Bel Air, Maryland, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Apr 10, 2002 not a bad start but the after taste is too wierd for me
GrainBeltGuzzler (249), Goodhue, Minnesota, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Apr 5, 2002 tastes pretty good to begin with, kind of like a mix of beer and citrus, but it is way too sweet and gets sickening after about a third of the bottle
satansspawn99 (24), USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Mar 29, 2002 couldn’t believe this was considered beer, not bad tasting, definate chick drink, tastes like what the advertise, citrusy
djbuddha (90), Many, Louisiana, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Mar 29, 2002 I cannot drink this at all. It tasted ok to begin with, but left a horrible after-taste.
aceofhearts (1375), San Francisco, California, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Mar 23, 2002 Total chick drink, tequila-ish tasting. On a non-beer scale of one to Smirnoff Ice, this ranks about an 8. In other words, it doesn’t belong on this web site!
IslandHaole (1035), Onna-Son, Okinawa-Ken, Japan
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Mar 22, 2002 Nice to buy for ladies at a club. Can’t even call this a beer.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)