YnotABeer (96) - Missouri, USA - JUN 3, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
not bad, but this is another beer where the label is the best part. weak, but some spice in the end which makes it ok enough to have again.
reebtogi (4151) - Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA - DEC 21, 2011
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
355ml bottle pours straw in color with a finger of head which settles very quickly leaving no lacing. Aroma is light malts and hops. Taste is of a typical macro lager. Enough said.
jtclockwork (8254) - , New Jersey, USA - MAY 14, 2010
1.1 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bought it as a joke plus the single bottle was dirt cheap. You get what you pay for. Pale yellow lager. Funky malt nose and taste. Rated 2/3/2000
machfive55 (358) - Columbia, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 29, 2010
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
This beer is getting some low ratings, however, I’m going to have to go against the grain a little on this. The beer I had is of unknown vintage, and unknown storage conditions. However, it was really not bad at all, the beer was very sweet showing almost all malt character and very nice caramel notes. There was very little hoppiness which could be due to being older. I also did not detect a whole lot of oxidation. Not bad at all, but not great either. Definately drinkable though and worthy of a fair rate.
wwwdottom (38) - Breese, Illinois, USA - JUL 31, 2009
2.4 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Unbeknown to me, this was sitting in a friend’s fridge for several years. Perhaps it was the age, but this tasted like a bock, having a strong malt presence and smooth finish. Would like to try a fresh sometime.
zach8270 (3439) - Henrietta, New York, USA - APR 28, 2009
2.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
(bottle - 12 oz) Had this one quite a while back but never rated it. Clear gold color with a very thin white head. Smells like a beer pretty much. Some dry hops and grass mixed with some malts. Flavor is pretty much the same. Dry hops mix with some hay and corn near the beginning and ends with a slightly dry and bitter malt and hop finish. Kudos to the awesome package though.
keepersj12 (2679) - Sicklerville, New Jersey, USA - MAR 15, 2009
0.9 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
Bought a case to frame for the bar. Bad beer but great pictures. Buy the case and keep the cardboard and bottle caps. Pour the beer in the sink.
ROGUE (2096) - Newark, Delaware, USA - FEB 5, 2009
1.3 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
12oz bottle. Just a plain american macro tasting pale lager, that is sold in a gimic six pack. Each cap has a different Stooge face, whoopie.
Cletus (6354) - Connecticut, USA - JAN 17, 2009
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Bought this for the label (see, marketing sometimes ropes us all in). Pours pale straw with some fizziness. Smells of creamed corn and skunky. Tastes watery with a stray hop or two. Basically Coors Light with a cool label.
MontereyJimbo (79) - Monterey, California, USA - AUG 13, 2008
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
Oh man I hate to do this. This beer is VILE, second only to that Birra Morretti crap. I love the 3 Stooges, how could this be sold in their name. I had to pur it after one sip. I can’t possibly describe it in terms of beer, maybe isopropyl alcohol with some finger nail polish remover (acetone) thrown in. Never again, sorry Moe, Larry, Curly.
italianjohn (2316) - Penndel, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 30, 2008
1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: APR 8, 2008 Goodness they all put the yeast in all right .... i’m not sure if the contents of the can are supposed to be drank but this beer was bad ..... the stooges of course classic