RateBeer
overall
11
27
style

bottled
common

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 379   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.45   EST. CALORIES: 159   ABV: 5.3%
Share this beer with friends!
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
Gold Medal Winning Beer Brewed By A Band Of Brewers Whose Passion For Brewing Doesn’t Stop When The Day Shift Is Over


2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 10/20
queenholly (3370) - South Whitley, Indiana, USA - FEB 18, 2013
Bottle. Light sweet barley malt aroma. Clear copper with a large off-white head. Light sweet barley malt flavor with a very slight grassy bitterness. Light body, soft carbonation.

2.1
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Slubgob (212) - West Hartford, USA - FEB 17, 2013
Drank straight from bottle. Overall impression is that if I were back in college this would’ve been a premium kegger pour. Nose is cheap beer, a bit metallic. Flavor is fair but unremarkable lager. Minimal hops, and a cheap beer cereal support of aftertaste (makes me want patio chips for some reason). Wouldn’t turn it down but wouldn’t buy it again.

2.6
   AROMA 5/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 5/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 12/20
wlajwl (4417) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - FEB 17, 2013
Aroma is caramel and nutty malts. The flavor is caramel malts, mildly gritty and a lightly tart finish.

1.5
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 3/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 5/20
Braudog (5975) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - FEB 17, 2013
Bottle. Pretty standard-looking "amber" beer. The head fizzles quickly. The aroma is weak and corny. The beer drinks slightly better than the aroma suggests, but in the end drinks like any dozens of macro lagers. (#4943, 2/17/2013)

2.8
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 12/20
Phatdog1 (179) - Brentwood, New Hampshire, USA - FEB 17, 2013
"Gold Medal Award Winner". Really? Twist top 12 oz bottle poured into straight pint glass. Light amber hue, not straw, a bit deeper that most of the conventional "national" brews. Small white head quickly disappears into the fizzy amber liquid. Minor lacing. Slight metallic scent. Cereal perhaps (might be some malt & hops hidden in there, too). Mild malty sweetness up front with some hop bitterness vaguely present on the finish. Tastes pretty decent. Nothing really stands out. I purchased this over the STANDARD "insert mass beer producers name here" beer, suspecting some trickery. Very drinkable and worth the 6 pack purchase.

2.6
   AROMA 3/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 6/10   PALATE 3/5   OVERALL 11/20
impaleyou (24) - Indiana, USA - FEB 16, 2013
Decent lager. Not great but very drinkable and refreshing. Wouldn’t go out of my way to find it but glad I tried it.

2.3
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 4/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 9/20
carlb (107) - East Lansing, Michigan, USA - FEB 16, 2013
Poured a brilliant amber-copper hue, producing a 1/4 inch cream-colored head that dissipated quickly. Some malt in the nose - not much hops. Grassy notes? Medium body. Light to moderate carbonation. Sweet malty palate. Short. Fresh. Crisp. Easy to drink. Not a cerebral beer. Lacing does form. It is an OK beer, but not good value considering the quality that exists at this price point.

1.1
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 3/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 3/20
wesyates (55) - Greenville, South Carolina, USA - FEB 16, 2013
I GOT DUPED! I forgot the phone with the RB app on it and I couldn’t get the rating. Man did I make a mistake. I like Yuengling as my everyday lawn mower beer but this is magnitudes lower. I even got the 12-pack based on a recommendation. Eeeeeesh. Had it known it was millercoors, I would never have bought it. They ought to call it "7urd $h1t" beer. Run, don’t walk away.

2
   AROMA 4/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 4/10   PALATE 2/5   OVERALL 8/20
Jakob (25) - Berlin, GERMANY - FEB 14, 2013
nice crisp carbonation but no head, nice hop aroma, but lacks in color and palate

1.2
   AROMA 2/10   APPEARANCE 2/5   TASTE 2/10   PALATE 1/5   OVERALL 5/20
twindadplus2 (625) - Wisconsin, USA - FEB 12, 2013
Is this coors’ answer to the microbrewers? Give their usual crappy beer a homey looking label and hope that makes it taste different? The only thing more ridiculous than calling this a vienna is saying it won a gold medal. It’s typical cheap macro swill but with a microbrew price.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page  1 « 29 30 31  32  33 34 35 » 38


Tick this beer

for your profile
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Copyright © 2000-2015,
RateBeer LLC. All rights
reserved.
about us
About RateBeer
FAQ
Contact/Feedback
New Beers
add
Advanced Search
Add A Beer
Add A Brewer
Add A Place
Events
membership
Log In
Edit Personal Info
Buy Premium Membership
Your Messages
the best
RateBeer Best
100 Beer Club
The Top 50