queenholly (3370) - South Whitley, Indiana, USA - FEB 18, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Light sweet barley malt aroma. Clear copper with a large off-white head. Light sweet barley malt flavor with a very slight grassy bitterness. Light body, soft carbonation.
Slubgob (212) - West Hartford, USA - FEB 17, 2013
2.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Drank straight from bottle. Overall impression is that if I were back in college this would’ve been a premium kegger pour. Nose is cheap beer, a bit metallic. Flavor is fair but unremarkable lager. Minimal hops, and a cheap beer cereal support of aftertaste (makes me want patio chips for some reason). Wouldn’t turn it down but wouldn’t buy it again.
wlajwl (4417) - Quad Cities, Iowa, USA - FEB 17, 2013
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
Aroma is caramel and nutty malts. The flavor is caramel malts, mildly gritty and a lightly tart finish.
Braudog (5975) - Phoenix, Arizona, USA - FEB 17, 2013
1.5 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle. Pretty standard-looking "amber" beer. The head fizzles quickly. The aroma is weak and corny. The beer drinks slightly better than the aroma suggests, but in the end drinks like any dozens of macro lagers. (#4943, 2/17/2013)
Phatdog1 (179) - Brentwood, New Hampshire, USA - FEB 17, 2013
2.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
"Gold Medal Award Winner". Really? Twist top 12 oz bottle poured into straight pint glass. Light amber hue, not straw, a bit deeper that most of the conventional "national" brews. Small white head quickly disappears into the fizzy amber liquid. Minor lacing. Slight metallic scent. Cereal perhaps (might be some malt & hops hidden in there, too). Mild malty sweetness up front with some hop bitterness vaguely present on the finish. Tastes pretty decent. Nothing really stands out. I purchased this over the STANDARD "insert mass beer producers name here" beer, suspecting some trickery. Very drinkable and worth the 6 pack purchase.
impaleyou (24) - Indiana, USA - FEB 16, 2013
2.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Decent lager. Not great but very drinkable and refreshing. Wouldn’t go out of my way to find it but glad I tried it.
carlb (107) - East Lansing, Michigan, USA - FEB 16, 2013
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Poured a brilliant amber-copper hue, producing a 1/4 inch cream-colored head that dissipated quickly. Some malt in the nose - not much hops. Grassy notes? Medium body. Light to moderate carbonation. Sweet malty palate. Short. Fresh. Crisp. Easy to drink. Not a cerebral beer. Lacing does form. It is an OK beer, but not good value considering the quality that exists at this price point.
wesyates (55) - Greenville, South Carolina, USA - FEB 16, 2013
1.1 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I GOT DUPED! I forgot the phone with the RB app on it and I couldn’t get the rating. Man did I make a mistake. I like Yuengling as my everyday lawn mower beer but this is magnitudes lower. I even got the 12-pack based on a recommendation. Eeeeeesh. Had it known it was millercoors, I would never have bought it. They ought to call it "7urd $h1t" beer. Run, don’t walk away.
Jakob (25) - Berlin, GERMANY - FEB 14, 2013
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
nice crisp carbonation but no head, nice hop aroma, but lacks in color and palate
twindadplus2 (625) - Wisconsin, USA - FEB 12, 2013
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Is this coors’ answer to the microbrewers? Give their usual crappy beer a homey looking label and hope that makes it taste different? The only thing more ridiculous than calling this a vienna is saying it won a gold medal. It’s typical cheap macro swill but with a microbrew price.