JoshuaB (475) - Detroit, Michigan, USA - JUN 3, 2005
4 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Does Three Floyd’s make a bad beer? My boy mike likened the smell to dank nugs, and I concur. At first whiff, I get brought back to the days of getting fat calio sacks. Anyways, how is the beer you ask? I am not the biggest fan of wheatbeers, but I loved this one. Very easy to drink. Nice wheat and hops present. Pours a golden amber color full of yeast with some clean white head. Just beautiful. Fruity grapefruit like flavor that finishes off with just a slight bitterness. Great summer brew to just enjoy.
pobenohne (504) - Northern Liberties, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 30, 2005
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
Bottle at Andy’s Carryout in Columbus. Wasn’t sure what I was getting into here - just one sip, and then I knew it was an American Wheat. Sorry, but these just don’t measure up against the German-style hefeweizens.
wnhay (722) - Princeton, New Jersey, USA - MAY 26, 2005
4.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Really cool summer brew. Great presentation with a dark golden color with a thick white head. The lacing was superb here, hence the perfect appearance score. Aroma was very hoppy with citrus, graitfruit and lemon. Kind of like a light IPA and with similarities to the Alpha King. Taste was very refreshing especially the mouthfeel. It had a real refreshing bitterness to it which was not overdone.
SwedeDog (364) - Windsor, Connecticut, USA - MAY 24, 2005
4.1 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 17/20
Bomber Split this bomber with my father after he helped me clear my backyard. I’m really proud of him, he’s come a long way from his Genny Cream Ale days. Poured hazy and golden, like a good wheat should ... or a dehydrated piss ... whatever. Aroma of citrus and piney hops. Not bad. When it was cold, it tasted more like a wheat beer ... wheat (duh) and citrus were there. As it warmed, it really took on an IPA feel with a load of hops in there. But the hops never overpowered the wheat aspects. Rather it combined naturally. It’s a pretty unique beer. Very good. Again, thanks to slob for the awesome trade!
mikeben (355) - Naperville, Illinois, USA - MAY 23, 2005
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
This was unusual. I did taste and smell things described on here like the leathery grassy taste that I used to think was peoples imaginations. It did have a very refreshing grapefruit taste and some unique smells and flavors. I liked it but did not love it. I would drink it again though as a nice alternative to the norm. I don’t think I could have it all the time though.
mj23 (63) - south holland, Illinois, USA - MAY 22, 2005
3.4 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Hoppy aroma, didn’t taste very hoppy though. Sweet fruity flavor, with a weak finish. Overall, not a bad wheat beer, but also not top of the line.
frankenkitty (1963) - Oak Lawn, Illinois, USA - MAY 21, 2005
4 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
Any time I can secure a Chicago Reader, I start with Section 4 and proceed directly to ’News of the Weird’, ’Life in Hell’ and ’Gumballhead the Cat’. The three of these always crack me up and let me get on with my day with a healthy dose of urban humor. (IMO, ’Ernie Pook’ has always sucked and is the sole downfall to the lineup. Bring back ’Zippy the Pinhead’!)
An average looking beer, with a typical amber body and a quick white head. But the aromas are what knock you on your ass, with a heavy dose of pine hops and "new leather smell". I thought that I might have gotten a mislabeled bottle (Alpha King?), but I later noticed the yeast which appeared as a few large chunks rather than as the cloudiness I’d expected from a wheat. Damn good citrus bitter flavors and a dry, biting finish.
<font size=-4><a href=http://www.ratebeer.com/Places/ShowPlace.asp? Wine & Spirits, Countryside, IL<font size=-1>
desurfer (1245) - Melbourne, Florida, USA - MAY 20, 2005
3.7 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 14/20
Pours a pale straw yellow with a small white head. Aroma is super hoppy and sweet; notes of orange peel and lemon. Tastes more like an APA than a wheat, with a nice wallop of dry hoppiness and some background maltiness. Whatever it is, it’s good!
OhioDad (2492) - Hilliard, Ohio, USA - MAY 19, 2005
3.9 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 17/20
Pours slightly hazy golden but amazingly clear for a bottle conditioned wheat brew. Nice 1/2 inch head on top rocky and white. Aroma is the most pleasant grapefruit aroma I’ve taken off the top of a beer. I could smell this one for a while if I weren’t so thirsty. Flavor starts off kind of sweet, with a touch of honey and you can taste that gumball flavor that I guess it gets it’s name from and wheaty. On the palate it is sort of boring a little thin and watery on the palate but a fantastic brew in aroma and flavor. This would be a great summertime beer were it not for the cost. Still I’m glad I got to try it!
Firemoose15 (567) - Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA - MAY 19, 2005
3.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
Clouded gold pour, nice white head. Hoppy aroma not really heavy wheat. Smooth wheat taste, about what you’d expect with a lite bitter finish. Definite summer wheat a little on sweet side. Tasty and refreshing, not overly complex.