AZBennett (114) - Chandler, Arizona, USA - APR 17, 2013
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
I believe they have changed this now that they are releasing it as a core beer. It now states it is a Lager, and it has all the lager characterists I have come to despise. Looks awesome in the glass as it is a crisp golden color. Smells sweet with no noticeable hops. The flavor is all sweet malts and sugars, everything I can’t stand about a lager with invisible hops. I will say this as I let it sit and kept drinking it grew on me a little and I decided it wasn’t a total waste. The palate is just a tad heavier than I would have thought it would be. Overall it’s not a bad lager (I just don’t like them) it’s probably a little above average as it didn’t have the usual off flavors that really turn me off to the style. But it’s not going to blow your socks off. If you are new to FFF don’t judge them based on this beer as it is the worst of theirs I have ever tasted.
arminjewell (7999) - Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA - APR 23, 2015
3.5 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
Pour on tap, clear golden pour with white head, aroma brought notes of bread, grass, herbal notes into a bit of vanilla, hints of grain, slight orange peel into a bit of yeast. Taste was a mix of vanilla, earth, bread into a bit of grass, herbal, orange, slight lemon, finishing fairly bitter, slightly dry.
Dorkenstein (24) - - APR 23, 2015
3.2 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
Slight floral aroma. When tasted very cold, it initially taste like a BMC lager, then creamy sweet cereal, then slight bitter hops. Very interesting. When the beer warms up, the lagerish taste fades some; leaving mostly sweet cereal grains and a mild bitter apricot finish.
madelfonatree (24) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - APR 12, 2015
3.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
A solid lager. I drank a Blatz yesterday and I wouldn’t be able to tell the difference (I like Blatz though).
Mears (48) - - APR 11, 2015
2.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
I tried it as it is three Floyd's. I don't like pilsner beers. So it is as expected to mild for me.
Marheb (2824) - San Diego, California, USA - JAN 14, 2015
4.5 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 18/20
Des céréales miellées à la façon Franconie sont pris dans une embuscade de citronnelle et pamplemousse juteux. Toute une surprise.
Frozer (183) - Illinois, USA - JAN 6, 2015
4.3 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 17/20
Crispy hop aroma. Clean refreshing taste. Light and sessionable. Perfect for the style. Super easy to drink. Complex hop profile.
Boomersmancave1 (85) - Indiana, USA - DEC 26, 2014
4.1 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Pours golden with a hoppy aroma. Bitter hoppy taste. Cereal and hoppy aftertaste. Good beer.
mikedR (1506) - Gilbert, Arizona, USA - DEC 20, 2014
4.1 AROMA 8/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 8/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 18/20
Suprisingly hoppy lager. Nice, sweet malt bill. Very flavorful overall. Recommended.
EyeAmBaldman (365) - Illinois, USA - DEC 15, 2014
2.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours a cloudy gold with a thick off white head. Aroma is very malty, which most times would be good. Taste is bitter for a lager, which maybe is the point, but to me the taste is off. Yet another 3 Floyds beer I don’t like.
jeffbigD (104) - - DEC 14, 2014
3.6 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 15/20
Pours with minimum head and a good taste off malt. Hops are lacking but overall taste is good.