SODAK14 (320) - Rapid City, South Dakota, USA - JUL 26, 2007
3.1 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 14/20
I was quite frankly surprised by this beer. I was expecting a light, no flavor beer...What I got was a beer with a nice flavor and great aftertaste. NICE!
dpjuart (1093) - Indiana, Pennsylvania, USA - JUL 25, 2007
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours light gold. Not much nose. Quick disapating head. Sweet, notes of honey. Nice subtle hops. Kind of sweet finish. complimented the sushi we had kinda well.
matt7215 (2276) - Cambridge, Ontario, CANADA - JUL 24, 2007
2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
500 ml can. poured yellow. aromas of malt and hops both present but subtle. very typical pale lager but not the worst ive tried. has some backbone and an ok bitter finish
bhensonb (13224) - Woodland, California, USA - JUL 23, 2007
2.4 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle. Aroma of grassy hop, perhaps a hint of corn or rice. Brassy gold color with a significant white head. Thin to medium bodied. Moderate carbonation. Starts with what seems to be a balance between pale malt sweetness and grassy bitter. The finish is rather dry, and the bitter stays. Rather clean, almost crisp. A pale lager on its way to being a pilsener. The Heineken of the East?
jbuzz (783) - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA - JUL 23, 2007
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 13/20
This is a good beer for casual drinking. It was a good easy taste and no after taste to hide any food tastes that may be accompanying it.
tomciccateri (1034) - Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA - JUL 23, 2007
2.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 13/20
From a 500ml can, pours a clear gold with a fading head. Well-carbonated, with a slight grainy character and pale malt flavor, with a slight hop bitterness and dry finish.
vyvvy (5136) - Florissant, Missouri, USA - JUL 19, 2007
2.9 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Pours pale clear yellow with very active carbonation and a good sized rocky white head. The aroma has clear pale malt, light corn traits and light spice. Medium / light body with a good amount of sharp carbonation. The flavor starts with typical pale malt and muddled spices. The finish is more of the same. Not bad, but quite boring. At least I’ve now tried a beer from Singapore.
mephisto (1284) - TAIWAN - JUL 18, 2007
0.8 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
pale yellow with white head, smells like hops and suger, or is that corn? crisy brew.
AlKHall (161) - West Hartford, Connecticut, USA - JUL 18, 2007
1.2 AROMA 1/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
All the way from singapore, but it was not worth the trip...I did not know if I would like tiger beer. I asked myself: is this something I would enjoy drinking? - I don’t know. It was a mystery. Now I know for sure. I do not like tiger beer. It does not taste good.
Canadianlush (169) - Scottsdale, Arizona, USA - JUL 13, 2007
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
Well this one was definately disappointing. Strange lager too. Too bitter not much hop, malt or barley flavor. Very pale, almost clear with no head. Not much chance of me ordering up one of these again.