richlikebeer (838) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 13, 2004
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Golden color and a thick white head that holds for a decent amount of the glass. Aroma is slightly malty. Slightly bitter with a strong malt base. Aftertaste is more or less the same as the body of the beer. This style is very similar to other asian beers I have had.
Palace536 (8) - Schenectady, New York, USA - OCT 29, 2004 does not count
3.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Having tasted this beer for the first time while in Singapore which is were the beer is brewed. I most certainly have a different impression of the beer than most. I thought that it was very good for a pale lager, which I donít usually choose first.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - OCT 26, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Light colour. Aroma is a simple bitterness but there is almost no bitterness in the flavour which is more sweet and corny. YUK
jsquire (3308) - St. Marys, Ohio, USA - OCT 23, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale golden color out of the bottle with a one finger fizzy white head that quickly dissappeared. Not much of a nose. Some malty sweetness with a faint citrus finish. Not much going on here, but not all that bad.
pivo (2542) - GERMANY - OCT 17, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Yellow color with a low sticky head. Some malt up front, honey-ish, low bitter. Thin and weak. Not as bad as I expected, but that doesnít say much - I was prepared for the worse.
punkeedo (498) - Covington, Louisiana, USA - OCT 9, 2004
2.2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Why am I not surprised that this beer comes from Singapore? Well, first off, with a name like Tiger...that tips ya off. Also, it smells like itís from India. OK, that may not make sense, but eat at an Indian restaurant (like I did today) and then try this beer later on, and youíll think "This smells like itís from India." Maybe itís something in the water...I dunno. It tastes similar to many domestic brews like Budweiser, except it has a certain flair about it--it helps that the Indian smell also smells of biscuits and that carries over into the taste. Not a terrible beer, but not as good as Singha.
tiggmtl (4548) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 7, 2004
1.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 4/20
Mildly sweet aroma. Clear golden colour with pretty much no head. Sweet yet lightly bitter with a strong alcoholic finish. Fizzy carbonation and watery body. I donít have the words to do this justice. Can. Thanks, JoeMcPhee!
paco (527) - Regina, Saskatchewan, CANADA - OCT 7, 2004
1.5 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 4/20
UPDATED: NOV 20, 2004 not very good at all. looks nice, but tastes awful. golden in colour, big white head, horrible taste.
beaconstreet (811) - Washington DC, USA - OCT 7, 2004
1.8 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
From bottle. Had been advertised to me by friends as an incredible beer, so of course it did not live up to its calling. Looked nice--good fluff-bubbly head, burnt orange/yellow color--but no dice on the sip. Grassy and harsh, masked only by the food I was eating at the time. Lots of bubbles, kind of bad on the palate. This cheap tasting drink is a marked contrast to the shee-shee, but excellent, "Tiger Tiger" bar in Piccadilly Circus in London. Ah, Bard, whatís in a name?
crazyvin (1836) - New York, USA - SEP 29, 2004
1.8 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
was very light but for its style what can someone expect. It was mainly malty with some citric notes in the aroma and flavor.