Derek881 (1044) - Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC - NOV 17, 2006
2.3 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 7/20
I purchased this beer in a bar in Shanghai, China, and was not disappointed, but not very impressed either. The aroma was malty and had a hint of floral character. The beer had an unexciting appearance, with a light golden color and thin, white head. The flavor was decent, and largely bitter. It had a light body with mild carbonation.
HomeBrewed (4) - Australian, NORWAY - NOV 17, 2006 does not count
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
33cl bottle. (27 NOK) Watery lager. Little flavour overall. Light colouration but head retention ok in glass.
homersimpsin (40) - South Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - NOV 17, 2006
2.1 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Good flavour, no head after its poured, it seemed a little flat, nothing special for an Imported beer, i wouldn’t buy it again, but would still drink it if it were free.theres better value out there!
Kevster (344) - Bradenton, Florida, USA - NOV 15, 2006
2.7 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 11/20
12 oz. Bottle: Pours clear golden with a foamy white head that diminishes rather quickly into nice lacing. Aroma is lemony with hints of floral and some malts. Malt flavor is sweet with hints of corn grain. A refreshing light beer.
voota (765) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - NOV 14, 2006
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 10/20
Probably one of my least hated pale lagers. Pale golden with a white fluffy head, aroma is lightly floral, with sweet malt in the background. The flavour is light but not too unpleasant, grainy malt and light floral hops are all there is really. The finish is crisp and refreshing.
TheJester (2094) - Peterborough, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 13, 2006
1.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
500 mL can. Pale yellow-gold with almost no head. Aroma is floral, with a bit of a wine spritzer thing going on. And corn. Corn syrup is dominant in the flavour. No finish. Not a winner.
DruncanVeasey (7551) - NUNEATON, CONF N, Warwickshire, ENGLAND - NOV 13, 2006
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Sweet, malty, slightly white-winey fruity aroma. wood and metal. The maize lends a very mellow, cereal-like flavour that’s barely there at all. A hint of soapy lemon that’s not completely unpleasant. maybe this could work. In a sauna.
HooperX (13) - Decatur, Georgia, USA - NOV 8, 2006
1.1 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 1/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Tried this at the Decatur Beer Festival, against the better advice of my friend, who insisted that Tiger was so gross that even sailors refused to drink it.
Man, he was right.
This stuff is so bad, the police will try to wrestle it away from you.
Finn (4710) - Tromsø, NORWAY - NOV 6, 2006
1.3 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 5/20
Bottle 0,5l. Pale golden coloured - almost yellow. A soapy white head. Sweet malt is traced in the aroma and flavour - and nothing more. Why bother bringing this to Norway where we have more than enough of tasteless lagers?
beerinmarch (2830) - Washington, USA - NOV 5, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Pours pale gold with a tall white head that actually lasts. Nose is lightly hoppy, kinda pilsner grassy quality. Flavor is watery and light, dry and crisp in the finish though. No skunking or canned corn flavors which was really nice, although the beer never really developed any flavor.