bridge (659) - Sydney, AUSTRALIA - JUN 23, 2006
1.4 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Just another crappy tropical asian lager. The adjunct (maize) is quite obvious, and the alcohol is blaringly so for something that is only 5% abv. The carbonation is shallow and a bit biting and once it subsides you get a quick burst of metallic bitter twang. Not quite as cloyingly sweet as some others, but after one of these Iím calling for a cleansing ale. Bring on some LCPA.
roder60 (1288) - Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA - JUN 22, 2006
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pours a clear bubbly pale yellow with a thin amount of froathy white head. Aroma is a bit grassy and corny and a tad sweet. Flavor is slighty honey sweet and then typical pale lager touch of hops. Overall, average.
Numenor (871) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - JUN 20, 2006
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Pale gold body with a minimal white head that diminishes quickly. Corn and honey aroma, nothing that great about it. Very malty body, too little in the way of hops... highly overbalanced. Dry ending.
Saarlander (1686) - Saarlouis, GERMANY - JUN 19, 2006
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Abit more hops would help this one, quite malty, drinkable if its hot, but Iíd otherwise pass.
Storm (2684) - Amager, DENMARK - JUN 13, 2006
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 7/20
33 cl bottle. No yeast at the bottom. Clear golden colour with a weak head. Light aroma of hops and notes of malt. Malty flavour with a touch of hops. Very average for a pale lager, someway dull.
Yankovitch333 (612) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - JUN 11, 2006
2.2 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 11/20
Pale yellow lager that tastes like every other pale lager you could drink. Itís refreshing on a hot summer day, but itís still nothing special.
nahthan (129) - Oakland, California, USA - JUN 7, 2006
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
From bottle in Bangalore, India. A drinkable beer from Singapore. Actually not a half-bad maltiness, which is very usual for beers coming from Southeast Asia. Some OK noble hop flavor coming through. Simple, clean beer. Nothing bad, nothing especially good. No real reason to drink it outside of Asia and nothing else is available. Ok.
eaglefan538 (2943) - Wilmington, Delaware, USA - JUN 2, 2006
3.1 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 7/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
A refreshing mid-end lager without much going on. Sampled straight from the bottle, so no idea what it looks like, but it wasnít overly carbonated and had a light mouthfeel. Overalll malty flavor with very little hopping. This was the first beer in which I could detect a light metallic aftertaste in the flavor. Nothing special, but not bad.
stanian (12) - ENGLAND - MAY 28, 2006
5 AROMA 10/10 APPEARANCE 5/5 TASTE 10/10 PALATE 5/5 OVERALL 20/20
The gold medal says it all, not every beer can boast to having won the beer world cup as Tiger did in 2004 and also in the lager category for bottled and canned lagers it is brewed under licence in many places but the best to my taste is the ones brewed in KL Malysia
bellyObeer (13) - CANADA - MAY 24, 2006
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Been to Singapore, but Iíve never tried their beer, so Tiger it was. Pretty plain beer, similar to many North American beers. Itís a good beer, but far from anything special.