Stew41 (1811) - Woodend, AUSTRALIA - DEC 13, 2004
2.2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 9/20
Veyr pale gold, looks commercial. Nose not doing much. Soft mouthfeel, again very commercial with minimum levels of hoppiness and not much more in the malt department. A hot arvo beer at best.
IslandHaole (1128) - Mililani, Hawaii, USA - DEC 8, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
Look, smells and tastes just about what I expected out of a S.E. Asian Lager. Mild scent of non-distinguishable malts and hops, slight wheat and dusty scents too. A bit sweet but has a bit thicker of a body than most of the other Asian macro lagers. Nothing fancy here. Would be better were I in Singapore on a hot humid evening washing down some spicy Szechwan dish or Indian curry
sfontain (846) - Columbus, Ohio, USA - DEC 7, 2004
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale yellow, almost whitish. Some adjunct sweetness in the aroma. Flavor is weak but there is a surprising amount of hop in the finish. Thin as water. Better than BMC but not by much.
ALyseen (42) - DENMARK - DEC 3, 2004
2 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 9/20
Golden color and a thick white head fates quikley. Thin and weak. sweet aroma. watery palate.
Sammy (9813) - Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - NOV 28, 2004
1.7 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Watery, no taste and some floral smell. Sweet malt and corn sweetness. Dry very bitter and metallic aftertaste. Pale yellow. Carbonation. A lot of soapy foam that gives some creamyness
richlikebeer (838) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - NOV 13, 2004
2.7 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 12/20
Golden color and a thick white head that holds for a decent amount of the glass. Aroma is slightly malty. Slightly bitter with a strong malt base. Aftertaste is more or less the same as the body of the beer. This style is very similar to other asian beers I have had.
Palace536 (8) - Waterford, New York, USA - OCT 29, 2004 does not count
3.6 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 16/20
Having tasted this beer for the first time while in Singapore which is were the beer is brewed. I most certainly have a different impression of the beer than most. I thought that it was very good for a pale lager, which I don’t usually choose first.
mutant (854) - Melbourne, AUSTRALIA - OCT 26, 2004
1.6 AROMA 3/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Light colour. Aroma is a simple bitterness but there is almost no bitterness in the flavour which is more sweet and corny. YUK
jsquire (3794) - St. Marys, Ohio, USA - OCT 23, 2004
2.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 8/20
Pale golden color out of the bottle with a one finger fizzy white head that quickly dissappeared. Not much of a nose. Some malty sweetness with a faint citrus finish. Not much going on here, but not all that bad.
pivo (2646) - GERMANY - OCT 17, 2004
2 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 8/20
Yellow color with a low sticky head. Some malt up front, honey-ish, low bitter. Thin and weak. Not as bad as I expected, but that doesn’t say much - I was prepared for the worse.