SynergyXJ (510) - Blacksburg, Virginia, USA - MAY 8, 2007
2.3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 9/20
Bottle Dark brown pour with little head. Wierd flavor. Pretty light and thin too, doens’t feel very portery. Pretty bad beer.
BDR (2534) - Roseville, Minnesota, USA - MAY 1, 2007
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: MAY 8, 2007 Dark brown color with minimal lacing and no head. Smells like a porter left exposed to air for a week or so. Truly awful saccharine sweet taste mingled with fish.
Ty5592 (1018) - Lansdale, Pennsylvania, USA - APR 11, 2007
1.3 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 1/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 2/20
UPDATED: APR 21, 2007 Nasty, sour, funky, bitter,infected, and medicinal. Utterly undrinkable. Just a sloppy brew. I can honestly say that this was one of the worst beers I’ve ever encountered. YUCK!! Drain Pour.
3fourths (7797) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - APR 10, 2007
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 6/20
Cloudy medium to light brown color with a tan head, built about two fingers thick on the pour and then quickly settling out. Nose of milk and cream and toasted grains, light burnt toast scent with a creamy milk chocolate character as well. Smells pretty good, but tastes absolutely horrible. What is going on? Tastes medicinal, lactic and sour – in a really bad way. Infected maybe? I’m not sure, I just know it tastes terrible. I poured it out.
JasonG (776) - Salt Lake City, Utah, USA - APR 7, 2007
1.9 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 6/20
12oz bottle: Deep brown/red color, crystal clear, with smallish creamy light tan head that dissipates rather quickly. Aroma has sour cherries, bit of chocolate and vanilla, slight metallic notes. Flavor has a bit of chocolate, cherries, and molasses up front, but quickly gives way to a striking chemically, lactic tartness that makes you pucker up throughout the finish. My first thought was that this was infected, but it seems like others have noted this as well. Not sure if this was just a bad batch, or if they were trying for this, but eitherway it doesn’t come off well.
richlikebeer (838) - Easton, Pennsylvania, USA - MAR 16, 2007
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 12/20
looks very nice, a slightly creamy looking dark brown body and a thin off white head that gives this a very guiness like look. nose is all chocolate with just a hint of vanila. flavor is pretty much the same, except for a slightly unpleaseant acidic tartness that finishes off the flavor and persists through the aftertaste. dont know yet if this is spoiled, i have some more bottles and may do a rerate later
starfireming (309) - Richmond, Virginia, USA - MAR 15, 2007
1.4 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
Clear dark body, tan head, dry chocolatey aroma, terrible flavour. All charred malt, with a little funk & some sour milk. Acidic, nasty, biley. Ugh.
SledgeJr (3577) - Omaha, Nebraska, USA - FEB 27, 2007
3 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 3/5 OVERALL 14/20
On tap at the brewpub. Pours a dark sepia brown with an off white head. has great lacing. There’s not much of a chocolate aroma, but the chocolate flavor is very rich and nice. I like it.
Beerdedone (2488) - Croydon, Pennsylvania, USA - FEB 20, 2007
2.6 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Bottle sampled with Stegosaurus. I was expecting so much more. chemical aroma and flavor, dar pour. just ok at best.
maniac (3800) - Baltimore, Maryland, USA - FEB 20, 2007
2 AROMA 6/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 3/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 5/20
Black body with a small tan head.Roasted malt aroma with some molasssas. Roasted malt flavor, almost charred malt, and some sour milk in the end.