CapFlu (5100) - Victoria, British Columbia, CANADA - OCT 2, 2003
1.9 AROMA 4/10 APPEARANCE 2/5 TASTE 4/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 8/20
UPDATED: SEP 14, 2006 (Bottle) Amber body with a medium, frothy white head. Slightly sweetened nose - likely the honey. Nothing special - an overly sweetened lager? Below average.
BeerPrince (1701) - Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - JUN 11, 2003
2.5 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Gold body with head. Little aroma, I guess it was slightly sweet. Flavour was sweeter but I didn't notice the honey per se. Was syrupy.
albert007 (415) - Penobsquis, New Brunswick, CANADA - MAY 12, 2003
1.2 AROMA 2/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 2/10 PALATE 1/5 OVERALL 3/20
I didnt like the flavour at all. Looked a little hazy, nice color, no head, decent carbonation. Too sweet in a bad way as well.
Crit (3775) - Surrey, British Columbia, CANADA - MAR 20, 2003
2.8 AROMA 5/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 5/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 13/20
UPDATED: JUL 8, 2007 Brilliant gold, white head. Light sweet nose. A slightly sweeter than normal lager. Nothing special. Decent body
austinpowers (2826) - New York, New York, USA - JAN 29, 2003
2.8 AROMA 7/10 APPEARANCE 3/5 TASTE 6/10 PALATE 2/5 OVERALL 10/20
Kind of reminds me of hemp beer. Must be the use of 'weed' in the name that's throwing me off, eh? As an aside, people in Vancouver really do say "eh", but they do not call each other "hosers" as the film "Strange Brew" would lead you to believe. But back to the beer - possesses a sweet smell and a tad more flavor than an ordinary lager. In a 10-lager tasteoff, I'd say this came in above average.
MarshallMac (143) - West Vancouver, British Columbia, CANADA - MAY 6, 2002
4.5 AROMA 9/10 APPEARANCE 4/5 TASTE 9/10 PALATE 4/5 OVERALL 19/20
i love this stuff, just drank a case last week actually. kinda weak on the alc. but a great cloured pils with slight hop flavouring and kind of a toasty aftertaste